Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

"Dissolve" MW and C-USA and re-form?

Not much has come out of the talks that began yesterday in Dallas, but an article that did come out yesterday, on CBSsports.com, reports that one option being explored by "the Hair" and BB would be to dissolve the two conferences, the MW and C-USA, and create a new league. The problem with such a proposal is that by remaining separate each conference would stand to receive its $13.6 million FBS payout. Instead of 2 conferences, each with a payout, there would only be one, and therefore, only one payout. That leaves a great deal of money on the table leading to speculation that an outright merger is unlikely.

Commissioner Thompson, who is "...not overly optimistic" about the MW receiving an AQ bid for the next two seasons, is looking into all options for the so-called "Big Country", as the conglomeration is being dubbed, because no league name has leaked out as of yet. The C-USA recently signed a $43 million deal with Fox, which presently has TV rights through 2015. This claim has been disputed by ESPN, believing it had an option on rights. Getting "Big Country", with a MW division, on Fox or ESPN would be a welcome change for fans and recruiters in the MW. Such a dissolution would allow the "Big Country" to negotiate a new TV deal, which would most likely kill the Mtn. network.

There are obvious issues still looming: what to do with Hawaii's partial membership? Can BB and CT negotiate a sliding contract, that would expand, should the alliance look to go up from 17 to 18, 20,22 or 24 teams? What would the payout for member teams be? Is there a big enough market even with an enhanced league (24 teams, 2 divisions) to warrant a big enough contract for an expanded league? How would such a league differ from the new Big East, which has the superior teams from the MW and C-USA? How would a smaller 17 - 18 member league even be able to compete with a similar scheduling alliance between the Pac 12 and B1G, which will have 24 teams? How would the larger version compare? Would the new TV rights make up the difference in potential FBS payout loss? Does the alliance have to go up to 24 teams to remain stable, should the MW or C-USA get raided again (AF might still be going to an expanded BE now that Navy has elected to give up its independent status)? Does the MW have to pre-empt such a move by AF, or others, to even make it to the alliance, because the MW has only 7 full members moving forward? Are there many teams, which would provide viable options for expansion, from an athletic and academic standpoint and which add marketable areas for the alliance? There seems to be a significant amount of dissatisfaction with the MW as it presently stands and something will have to change.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

On the flipside though

Neither conference can survive given the extensive raiding that they have had over the last several years. Even though it isn’t 100% ideal I think it is necessary and I do like the idea of having 10 FBS Conferences instead of 11. The fewer conferences there are, the fewer the number of people screwed there are. I think the Mountain West has long outlived it’s purpose (splitting from the WAC because they were too large) and there is no need for both a WAC and an MWC at this point.

by Jesterrace on Jan 19, 2012 12:06 PM PST reply actions  

Oh yeah

and I hope they fire Hair and he takes the crappy media deal with him. No way the C-USA folks are going to want that craptastic media exposure killing deal.

by Jesterrace on Jan 19, 2012 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Lol, "the Hair" redux

Looks like CT would be the commissioner of the new “Big Country” as BB is expected to replace CN in the Big XII. We might be stuck with this unimaginative, slow moving reactionary.

by jitmon on Jan 20, 2012 8:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Somebody please fire this dunce

before he not only runs the Mountain West into the ground but C-USA as well. As for BB going to the Big 12? That conference is in serious trouble if that happens. Neinas is much better for the long term.

by Jesterrace on Jan 20, 2012 12:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Yup

Then again some of the FCS teams are better than the bottom end WAC or MWC teams.

by Jesterrace on Jan 19, 2012 7:11 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Mountain West Connection we are dedicated to all things MWC. For Convenience follow us @ JeremyMauss via twitter.

Managers

Jer_small Jeremy Mauss

Authors

Pro-nedna-twitter-icon01_small Sam (sdsuaztec4)

6061-1_1__small rebelfan1

Img_0065__1__small greekpadre

Bsu_logo5_small bluesyourdaddy

Tcuflag_small Ben Findley

Commander_in_chiefs_trophy_small airforcetwo

2462299_small pack_fan

Nevada_wolf_pack_logo_small WolfpackNev

007_small Chris Holly Taylor

Werder_small jitmon

Dogs_small ROFLCOPTER16

559507_10150739587463754_502418753_9510642_1800825799_n_small Anthony Capobianco

Lrg_san_diego_state_aztecs144_small Thomas Briggs