The Mtn.: Get Active
Is the Mountain West's Network, "the Mtn.", a boon or a bane for the Mountain West conference and its quest for visibility and acceptance? Since the MW parted ways with its ESPN viewership and ushered in the first conference network, on September 1st, 2006, there has been disagreement about the Mtn.'s ability to offer the MW the kind of platform it needs to showcase it's teams, not only nation wide, but even in it's own regions. This inability has exacerbated the difficulty some member institutions have had in reaching larger audiences, both in recruiting and in advertising, and has arguably led to the defections of some of the more prominent institutions for larger, better paying and more visible conferences, or even for no affiliation at all.
The contract offered to the member institutions of the Mountain West is between $1.4 - $1.9 million annually. While better than the contract offered to the WAC conference by ESPN, which offers its member institutions a little under $500,000 annually, this pales in comparison to the contracts offered the so-called AQ conferences. So what can the MW do about the woeful state of affairs in relation to its TV contract? Quite a bit: the contract with Comcast is upon the calendar year 2012. There is an outdated article from the Honolulu Star Advertiser, which is one of the few to discuss the issues involved with the MW contracts, that outlines some of the issues involved. More importantly, what can all of the MW fans do about the predicament the fearless leaders of the MW failed to see coming?
For those of you, who haven't seen this site on the the Mtn's website, here is what you can do to get the Mtn. better distribution, in more areas. This could then lead to more advertising revenue and provider fees, and hopefully, more overall funding for the member institutions:
Fans, like you, we would like extended distribution of our network. To do this, we encourage your support by making your voice heard and letting distributors know that you would like to see The Mtn.
Distribution decisions are made by viewer demand so every call, email and letter will help.
~ Thank you.Contact your cable or satellite provider and tell them "You Want The Mtn."
Cable / Satellite Provider Phone Number Website AT&T Uverse Ph: 800.288.2020 www.att.com Charter Communications Ph: 888.438.2427 www.charter.com
Live Chat (current customers)Comcast Ph: 800.266.2278
Live ChatDish Network Ph: 888.581.9813 or
888.686.2388Feedback
Live Chat (current customers)Time Warner - San Diego Ph: 888.892.2253 Time Warner - North Texas Ph: 972.742.5892
Live ChatVerizon FIOS Ph: 888.881.8161
Live Chat
As it stands, subscribers to Direct TV and Comcast can get the Mtn., but Dish and certain areas with Time Warner cannot (see above for more details). That means the Dallas/Fort Worth and San Diego areas could not watch their MW teams, unless they had specific network subscriptions. This is cited as the primary reason, by the presidents of BYU and Utah, for wanting to leave the MW. It is no doubt a leading reason for SDSU and TCU wanting out of the MW: more money, more availability to the local residents and more exposure.
If you subscribe to any of these providers, please contact them early and often to vigorously campaign for the Mtn.'s inclusion into their respective programming additions. They will only do so, if a significant amount of requests are made, and no one knows how many it takes to reach the critical mass, which would warrant inclusion. Get active and get the Mtn. included, so that the remaining MW institutions get the increased funding and visibility they deserve!
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good info
But, I hate to be that guy. Calling in and inquiring about the channel or asking the provider to carry it really does do nothing. When it was only available in SLC on Comcast I called a few times to DirecTV and they knew nothing about the channel or said that I got it if I bought the sports package.
by Jeremy Mauss on Jan 12, 2012 9:46 AM PST via mobile reply actions
which is still not on time warner
by Jeremy Mauss on Jan 12, 2012 6:56 PM PST via Android app up reply actions
Exactly.
Caps lock is not cruise control for cool.
by ROFLCOPTER16 on Jan 13, 2012 8:47 AM PST up reply actions
The Mountain is like all conference proprietary networks
A CANCER THAT IS ONLY GOOD ON PAPER!!!!!!!!!!!! While the increased revenue was nice it ultimately killed any chance the MWC had of becoming a BCS Conference with it’s crappy media exposure. When you consider that potentially the Mountain West could’ve become the next of the big conferences. Utah saw it, BYU DEFINITELY SAW IT, TCU saw it and now BSU and SDSU have seen it as well. When you consider that the WAC and C-USA got far more media exposure than the Mountain West teams did, it’s kind of sad. Fans don’t really want to have to have ESPN, Versus, CBS Sports, and the Mtn to watch 12 games of football and potential recruits certainly don’t want to tell their families or potential pro scouts that they need all of that just to see them play (especially when a number of providers don’t even carry them). You can’t be a national conference with a borderline regional media deal.
This point was driven home for me this season. The BSU vs Air Force game which took place not 20 miles from my house was aired on the Versus Channel. Cost for me to get the Versus Channel: a $60 a month package. During halftime I checked though to see if I could find any highlights on local TV and I couldn’t find a peep (because the Versus doesn’t play well with other networks), but guess what I could find. . .the Fresno State vs. Nevada game coming in live from Reno for free on Rabbit Ears. So even in the Boise area Fresno State and Nevada got better media coverage than a top 10 team and arguably the best of the armed service academies. How can anyone take your conference seriously with that kind of exposure.
The bottom line get rid of the stupid Mountain Network and let versus (now NBC Sports) do what it does best. . .COVER FCS TEAMS!!!!!!!!!!
Tell it like it is
Jes, you are preaching to the choir: Amen! The C-USA deal with Fox goes through 2015 for 20 games a year, I wonder where the others are seen (12 teams + 12 games = 144 games?), 144 – 20 = 124 non-televised games? Neither Commissioner seems to be worth his weight in @#$%^& for inking these deals. Looks like the new “Big Country” is a way for BB and CT to hit the reset button. We will most likely be stuck with “the Hair”, so we can only hope he has learned from his mistakes. Apparently, both CT and BB are being coached by Chuck Neinas. He has done well for the Big XII since coming in. Lets hope some of his boxy rubs off on these two reactionaries, so we can see ALL of our teams without having to buy a $60 package for one channel!
Neinas is a good mentor
Former Big 8 Commish and interim Commish for the Big 12, but I feel that the best direction for both conferences is new leadership.
We may get our wish
Looks like Hair is looking at being the Minnesota AD.
That is just sad
Even Comcast doesn’t support it in all markets. Definitely high time to get out of that craptastic media deal.

by 




















