Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Why Not Houston To The Mountain West?

This post is being promoted from the fanshot section partially because it is good and to give equal time to a similar article regarding UTEP to the Mountain West.

Academics
Commuter School
Why is UH not in the Big 12
Can Houston Compete
Sports History
Sports Status
Leadership
New Facilities
Location
Texas Recruits



During recent realignments the University of Houston has been mentioned as a possible conference addition. The question: "Why not Houston?" has been asked and many comments have been made. Some accurate and current information is provided below.

Star-divide

Academics

One blog comment stated "Tier 4 — that’s pretty bad." This statement was true years ago, but is not accurate today.

The University of Houston has several high quality colleges University of Houston Rankings:
The U.S. News & World Report ranks the Bauer College of Business as 63rd in the nation among public universities. It has been ranked the best entrepreneurship program by the Princeton Review.

It ranks the University of Houston Law Center 60th in the nation and it ranks three of the Law Center's specialty programs in the top ten in the country.

In 2002, the Hilton College of Hotel and Restaurant Management ranked third in the nation in hospitality management by the Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education.

According to the Institute for Scientific Information, five of the top fifty cited physicists in the world come from the university's College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics.

The Hines College of Architecture is one of only 36 schools to have an accreditation certificate from the NAAB for both Bachelor's and Master's Degree programs.

The university is in the process of raising its standards. What many people, particularly out side of Texas, do not know is this is being addressed in a large scale effort. Voters in Texas approved a proposition in 2009 to create more Tier One universities. Texas currently has three: University of Texas at Austin, Texas A & M, and Rice. $500,000,000 has been made available to aid several state universities in becoming Tier One. Of the universities eligible for this program, Houston is the closest to achieving this goal:

  • The University of Houston ranks third behind UT and A&M in the following categories: research expenditures, doctorate degrees awarded and doctoral program enrollment.
  • UH already is classified at the highest level as a doctoral-granting research university by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Some 260 doctorates in 50 disciplines are awarded every year.
  • Many UH individual programs, schools and colleges already are classified as top-tier or are highly ranked among the best in the country.

To achieve Tier One, it must:

  • Increase annual fundraising in support of priority academic programs
  • Improve the quality of the freshman class and guarantee its success
  • Raise the annual research from the current $81,000,000 to $150,000,000

The university is currently on a plan to achieve this goal in five years. This will be done. The determination and will exist, and resources are available.

Commuter School

While Houston has over 200,000 alumni in the Houston area, attendance at its games has been low for a number of years. Until recently, on-field performance has been low as well. Some say this is because it it a "Commuter School" and the alumni has little loyalty to the school. Houston deserved this label in the past. It was a working student's school. They worked part time or full time and struggled to attend classes. Many succeeded. The university served the city well in this capacity.

There are more than 3,500 UH alumni who serve as president/CEO of their companies, including PricewaterhouseCoopers Chairman and Global CEO Samuel DiPiazza, Delta Air Lines CEO Richard Anderson, Neiman Marcus CEO Karen Katz, Centerpoint Energy president and CEO David McClanahan, Brinker International CEO Douglas Brooks, Dynegy Chairman and CEO Bruce Williamson.

As for the commuter label, thousands of new dorm rooms have been built on campus. More will be built. The intent is to increase the number of students living on campus. Like other universities, students living on campus are more involved.

Attendance and on-field performance both fell when the Southwest Conference terminated and Houstion was not admitted to a BCS conference. Advancement has taken years while Houston coped with poor coaching and schedules. There are new coaches and administrators and attendance is on the rise as sports teams are experiencing greater success. It has been the winningest team in C-USA over the last five years. The football team has gone to a bowl for five straight years and had 17% increase in attendance in 2009 over 2008. Further increases are expected as Kevin Sumlin continues building the team. The basketball team went to the NCAA tournament in 2010.

Of course, this pails in comparision to some major teams, but it does show progress.

Why is UH not in the Big 12

There are a number of factors related to why Houston was not included in the Big 12 instead of some other school, including:

  • Low attendance,
  • Low travel to away games, and
  • The desire by some to prevent Houston from competing for top atheletes

The first two are questionable. The last one is not. When Houston joined the SWC, it hit it like a bolt of lightning. The football team won three conference championships in the first four years, and other teams did not cope with "Phi Slama Jama", Houston Cougars men's basketball - Wikipedia, very well either. Houston had teams that were fun to watch and people did. It was recruiting great players in football, basketball, and other sports. In order for some teams to be able to recruit top players in the "hot" Houston area, the Cougars had to fall and politics took them down.

Can Houston Compete

The SEC is generally accepted as the toughest conference is football.

1996 LSU 35 Houston 34
1999 Alabama 37 Houston 10
1999 LSU 7 Houston 20
2000 LSU 28 Houston 13
2003 Mississippi St 35 Houston 42
2005 Mississippi St 16 Houston 28
2006 South Carolina 44 Houston 35
2007 Alabama 30 Houston 23
2009 Mississippi St 24 Houston 31

That's 4 wins in 9 games.

The only home game for the Cougars was in 2003.
Talk about advantage.

Also, the Alabama game was closer than the final score.
Considering Houston has improved over the last 5 years, it would appear to be at least a mid-level school in the SEC.

Can Houston Compete


The SEC is generally accepted as the toughest conference is football.

1996 LSU 35 Houston 34
1999 Alabama 37 Houston 10
1999 LSU 7 Houston 20
2000 LSU 28 Houston 13
2003 Mississippi St 35 Houston 42
2005 Mississippi St 16 Houston 28
2006 South Carolina 44 Houston 35
2007 Alabama 30 Houston 23
2009 Mississippi St 24 Houston 31

That's 4 wins in 9 games.

The only home game for the Cougars was in 2003, so talk about not having an advantage. Also, the Alabama game was closer than the final score.

Sports History

Football:

  • 10 Conference titles
  • 20 bowl appearances
  • 1 Heisman
  • 1 Lombardi
  • 2 Sammy Baugh
  • 1 Davey O'Brien
  • 18 Consensus All-Americans
  • 15 finishes in the AP Poll and Coaches' Poll
  • Andre Ware(Heisman), David Klingler(Sammy Baugh), Case Keenum(Sammy Baugh),Wilson Whitley(Lombardi), Kevin Kolb(Philadelphia Eagles starting QB) Robert Newhouse(Dallas Cowboys),

Basketball:

  • 7 Regular Season Championships
  • 6 Conference Tournament Championships
  • 19 NCAA Tournaments appearances
  • 5 NCAA Tournament Final Four appearances
  • Game of the Century: Houston and UCLA in first NCAA regular season game broadcast nationwide in prime time paved the way for the modern "March Madness" television coverage
  • Hakeem Olajuwon, Clyde Drexler, Michael Young, Larry Micheaux, Elvin Hayes, Don Chaney, Otis Birdsong, ...

Golf:

  • 16 team national championships
  • 8 individual national championships
  • 19 conference championships
  • 44 All-Americans

Track:

  • 17 event championships ranking them 26th among all schools (tied with Florida, Nebraska, Oregon State).
  • 5 titles in the 100-meter dash which is tied with Tennessee for the second most all-time
  • 14 times among the top 15
  • Carl Lewis, Leroy Burrell,

Olympics:

  • More than 50 Olympic athletes
  • 33 medals, including 19 gold
  • Conclusion

    The goals set by Renu Khator, president, is for Houston to be Tier One in both academics and athletics within five years. The resources are available.

    Texas is big. Don't sell Texas short.
    The city of Houston is big. Don't sell Houston short.
    Houston is the "hottest" of the "hot" in high school athletics.
    The University is big. Don't sell the Cougars short.

    Houston Cougars Football - Wikipedia
    Houston Cougars men's basketball - Wikipedia Houston Cougars Golf University of Houston - Wikipedia University of Houston - answers.com U.S. News & World Report

Comment 98 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Why not!

I have been watching Houston for several years, worrying that the MWC would pick them over BSU for conference expansion. And for all the reasons you have pointed out.

But I am surprised you didn’t mention their recently unveiled plans for new football stadium and a renovated Hofheinz Pavilion for the Cougars. That new football stadium is estimated to cost $120 million so we know they are not afraid to pour money into their sports programs. The UH has been wanting to move up to the Big XII, but that won’t happen for a number of reasons. But the MWC would offer them a chance at accomplishing their goal of becoming a BCS team as the 12th team in the conference and a rival for TCU.

Yeah. Why Not Houston?

by bluesyourdaddy on Aug 24, 2010 7:45 AM PDT reply actions  

But the Football Stadium

has absolutely no funding at this point. Any one buying UH because of that is assuming a lot.

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com) and one of the top Rockies writers at the Bleacher Report.

by Redhawk on Aug 24, 2010 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldnt say zero funding

They need to create a lot more funding. The announcement was in hopes to get funding for the new stadium. I hope it gets done and within the next decade.

Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!

by Jeremy Mauss on Aug 24, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

They need to get it done- and I think they will-

It’s always shocked me how surprisingly awful the facilities were there- given the history of the program.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 24, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why Not, Indeed!

Great article. Thanks

Fear the Frog!

by SammyOBrien on Aug 24, 2010 8:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Hopefully VA Libertarian sees this

He recently made the argument for UTEP, and I had my mind changed by him. It was mainly because of all the reasons you stated, commuter school, poor academics… With you now showing that those were not facts, I not want Houston no matter what.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 24, 2010 9:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Actually…. those remain the facts. It’s still a Tier II school overall (and before anyone gets ahead of themselves, UTEP is also Tier II and a ‘Best College 2011’).

It’s also still a commuter school – it doesn’t matter if they’ve built more dorms. The majority of the students are from the area and don’t live on campus or hang out anywhere near it. See: North Texas.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Reason Houston is not in the Big 12

is mainly due to the fact that they aren’t needed and superfoulous. Texas A&M, UT, and even Oklahoma are of greater interest to Houston and the TV’s than UH is.

Poor Attendance…is an issue as well. The Big 12 has a minimum requirement of 50,000 football stadium. Which is one big reason that TCU’s renovation had that seating levels.

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com) and one of the top Rockies writers at the Bleacher Report.

by Redhawk on Aug 24, 2010 9:25 AM PDT reply actions  

UH is never getting into the Big 12

Neither is TCU. Texas isn’t going to let anyone else in that doesn’t bring more $ than they take. Houston also angered a ton of Longhorn fans and the reason UT stopped scheduling UH a few years back because UT wanted their game to be at Reliant where the Texans play. UH insisted on playing in front of 24,000 fans (mostly in burnt orange anyway) and the Horns never forgave them. That’s why UT is willing to play Rice because the Owls are willing to play in front of 60,000 plus at Reliant.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 24, 2010 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's not just that the stadium only holds a few fans.

They installed temporary bleachers and then they were declared unsafe the day before the game. UH provided video screens for UT fans who had tickets to the game to watch from campus.

by Texas Wahoo on Aug 24, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Texas ANY MEMBER OF THE BIG IIX isn’t going to let anyone else in that doesn’t bring more $ than they take.

And this is one(and there are several) of the reasons I think the 4 × 16 super-conference idea set up is dead. Seriously I wish more people understood this pretty basic idea. All those moving schools around from Conference A to Conference B…usually miss this vital point.

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com) and one of the top Rockies writers at the Bleacher Report.

by Redhawk on Aug 24, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

But does Houston want to come to the MWC?

If you guys lose BYU, then the sales pitch to Houston gets a little harder (ignoring the rumors of merged championship games and whatnot). MWC is still going to be better than C-USA at the top, with Boise & TCU looking better than the revolving door of Tulsa/ECU/Southern Miss/UCF that C-USA has, but just below that CUSA compares very favorably with Air Force, Wyoming, CSU, etc.

In CUSA, Houston has a much more appealing travel base- Houston currently has six conference-mates within 500 miles, while the closest other MWC member besides TCU is well beyond that. Greenville, NC is closer to Houston than the farther-flung MWC schools, and they only have to take the football team there once every four years.

Moreover, Houston won’t replace BYU, or Utah for that matter- their last four years are 10-4, 8-5, 8-5, 10-4. 6-6 before that run. They haven’t made it through C-USA unbeaten since realignment (to be fair, nobody has). But even if they think they are the best team in the league, they may not be in such a hurry to add at least two teams that can compete on their level every year.

Houston certainly might go for the Mountain West, I’m just saying it’s not a cut and dry choice from their perspective.

by lowercase on Aug 24, 2010 10:59 AM PDT reply actions  

they just want a better league

While the big 12 isn’t happening they will take the mwc if byu stays because a bcs bid seems more likely.

Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!

by Jeremy Mauss on Aug 24, 2010 11:45 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think I'm personally ready to move on- and wait for the BYU "decision"

And I think that the pro-UTEP and pro-UH posts are both moot because I don’t see the MWC raiding the C-USA anytime soon, or the C-USA moving to poach the MWC either. The conferences are going to be allies- or at least that’s what seems to be the plan for now.

But, I will simply point out that all that “Tier 1” funding the author is describing is also going to UTEP. UTEP, Texas Tech, and UH are among the schools that will benefit from the state funds- not just UH. I think both schools are fine academic institutions and really- in realignment are academics really an issue?

If these posts have shown me anything it’s that the MWC may have been better off going the Houston, UTEP, Fresno route instead of the Utah State, Fresno, Nevada route. But again, I don’t think they went that way because the league intends to work with C-USA.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 24, 2010 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Ok one last thing- Because I can't let this one slide
Also, the Alabama game was closer than the final score.
Considering Houston has improved over the last 5 years, it would appear to be at least a mid-level school in the SEC

.

What? Mid-level SEC team? Look at some of their other losses before you put UH ahead of Tennessee, Ole Miss, and Georgia.

2009
Losses- UTEP, East Carolina, UCF, Air Force (47-20)- Bowl

2008
Losses Oklahoma State 37-56, Air Force, Colorado State, Marshall, Rice

2007
Losses- Oregon (27-48), East Carolina, Alabama, Tulsa, TCU (Bowl)

2006
Losses- Miami (Fl), Louisiana Lafayette, Southern Miss, South Carolina (Bowl)

2005-
Losses- Oregon, UTEP, Memphis, UCF, Southern Miss, Kansas (42-13) (bowl)

2004
Losses- Rice, Oklahoma, Miami, Memphis, Southern Miss, TCU, UAB, Louisville

2003
Michigan, Memphis, TCU, Southern Miss, Louisville, Hawaii

2002
Tulane, Texas, TCU, UAB, ECU, Cincinnati, South Florida

UH schedules tough and has some marquee wins but let’s not get too carried away and proclaim them to be a “Mid level SEC team- that’s ridiculous.” Show me a mid level SEC team over the last 7-8 years who loses to Tulane, UTEP, Southern Miss, Hawaii, Rice, South Florida, Tulsa, UAB, etc.

Houston deserves a ton of credit for improving their football squad and I can’t compare their recent success to UTEP’s, but I don’t think their success should be exaggerated. They lost 3 games to C-USA squads last season.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 24, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Why Not Houston-2

After being down for years, the Cougars are charging. After being hired in June of 2009,
atheletic director Mack Rhoades made five Houston Cougars head coaching changes,
re-did the contracts of three others, and made numerous other changes.

Football recruiting has improved significantly as shown by the following from Rivals.com:

Year Rank 2008 100 2009 61 2010 45


The football team was ranked in the top 25 in 2009 for the first time since September 17, 1991.
Season tickers are up 82.5-percent over 2009.

Since being hired in March of 2010, basketball coach James Dickey has an outstanding
recruiting class.

by since1670 on Aug 24, 2010 12:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Just a brief aside:

This has been an absolutely fascinating topic of conversation (USU v. UTEP v. Houston). I for one am glad that the decision is not in my hands, but I’m enjoying this topic more than anything else as we wait for the season to start.

Do carry on…

by David Hooper on Aug 24, 2010 12:52 PM PDT reply actions  

+1 Completely agree

We need someone to write “The Case for Utah State over UTEP and Houston”

by Adrian Mac on Aug 24, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Case for Utah State over UTEP and Houston

For 2011? All set Utah St., but thanks for playing.

Really though, the only reasons I can think of is that adding Utah St might help appease BYU into staying put? Or maybe to keep some kind of footprint in the SLC market if BYU goes indie?

by Smoove V on Aug 24, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it has to be the latter.

I just don’t see any reason why Utah St. would factor into BYU’s decision.

by holly96 on Aug 24, 2010 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

The latter is the only reason we are even discussing them.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 24, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Invite Houston now. UTEP + 1 in 2011

I want both these schools in the MWC.

Assuming BYU stays put, methinks the MWC should invite Houston now in order to get to twelve teams and improve our BCS stats. Once the MWC gets BCS auto bid status, expand to 14 teams with UTEP +1 (Utah St? San Jose State? Texas Tech???).

That would be conference we can all be proud of especially in Hoops.

by Smoove V on Aug 24, 2010 12:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Not likely

as it took how many years to get past 9 and add BSU? Thompson and the MWC are sick to their stomachs now with 11 schools. They certainly remember the fiasco of the 16 team WAC idea.

Better think one team is getting in. Going to 12 and have a playoff —maybe—and they also worry about the extra mouths to feed if the money pie is cut into ever smaller pieces. If BYU bails and no chance at BCS, then they probably stay at 10 and see what happens down the road in year or two.

by bluesyourdaddy on Aug 24, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't stay at 10

This has to be the fifteenth time I am stating this. If BYU leaves then we have to add Utah State to keep all the Utah TV Infrastructure. Most of our TV revenue comes from Utah and if we didn’t have a Utah school in the conference our deal would become even crappier.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 24, 2010 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would adding Utah St will do anything if BYU leaves?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but if BYU leaves doesn’t Comcast have the option to just drop The Mtn. altogether?

I have to believe Comcast execs aren’t foolish enough to believe Utah St is going to deliver the SLC market.

by Smoove V on Aug 24, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

They aren't stupid

But the contract says that the infrastructure has to stay as long as there is a team in the conference…

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 24, 2010 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I'm not mistaken the contract HAS to be renegotiated if both BYU and Utah leave.

So it doesn’t really matter if USU joins, the contract will essentially be void. This is the angle that I think the MWC should be working. Use BYU’s hold out status as leverage with Comcast. Say ‘hey, if BYU leaves you’ll lose one of the largest sections of viewership and we’ll have to renegotiate anyway.’ Use this to try to hammer out a better deal now that will influence BYU to stay. Which is a win for Comcast, BYU, and the MWC.

by NC Ute on Aug 25, 2010 6:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

and from what I'm gathering

the MWC would LOVE to renegotiate their TV-deal as it’s been a huge bust. Why would they take in Utah St…to keep that going?

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com) and one of the top Rockies writers at the Bleacher Report.

by Redhawk on Aug 25, 2010 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why Not Houston-3

The article was not written to get into a competition, although that does provide interest.
I became fired-up because some people, particularly in Texas, make comments about
the academics at Houston which are absolutely untrue.

Many Houston Cougar fans have mixed feeling about the possilbility of joining MWC.
If that were to happen, I would like to see: Houston, UTEP, and SMU added. That
would ease some of the travel concerns.

In any event, the MWC is excellent.

Best wishes for a great season to all.

by since1670 on Aug 24, 2010 1:07 PM PDT reply actions  

The academics case is absolutely true. For 95% of the students there, the academics are poor. Again, selling individual programs doesn’t make the overall university very good.

Houston is a Tier II university. Period. I don’t make the rankings, I merely report them. And I’m not trying to say UTEP is somehow vastly better, because it’s Tier II as well, but at least it’s not Tier II and a commuter school.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Um.... no

Houston is still a Tier 2 school overall. Selling individual programs and departments is an amateur’s game – every university can do this. Sometimes individual programs and departments wind up in the ‘top 10’ even when there are only 11 other schools with a given program.

As for Houston’s 4 wins in 9 tries against the SEC…. 3 of those are against Mississippi State, so let’s not go kidding ourselves. I went to South Carolina, and consider my alma mater to be average at best, and you lost in pretty poor fashion to us when y’all were C-USA champs. Not exactly the sign of an ‘elite’ program to me.

It’s also still a commuter schools – North Texas is building a lot of new dorms too, but it’s still a commuter school as well. Why? Because in both schools’ case, most of the students draw from the surrounding metro area, and the campus isn’t considered enough of a ‘college’ for people to want to hang out there. Sorry, but it’s the truth.

As for Houston’s SWC days, I think it’s important to remember how awful they were towards the end. A few good years at the beginning doesn’t erase Houston going:
1995: 2-9
1994: 1-10
1993: 1-9-1
1992: 4-7
1991: 4-7
That’s a pretty awful final 5 years of the SWC.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Also

Houston:

1.) Has history with only one team in the conference (TCU), compared to UTEP’s 6, one of which defined two decades of WAC basketball (UTEP-BYU).

2.) Has fewer national championships (16) than UTEP (21).

3.) Has averaged nearly 18,000 fewer fans than UTEP over the past 5 years, and consistently hovers around the 15,000 fan mark when they’re not having a winning season.

4.) Plays in an old, tiny stadium, with no funding for a new one anytime soon.

5.) Has a horrible climate, particularly in comparison to the climates of other MWC institutions.

6.) Would be a geographic extreme for the conference.

7.) Isn’t significant towards anyone’s ability to recruit the Houston area. I’ve been over this a thousand times (or so it feels).

8.) Will inevitably lose Sumlin, and there’s no guaranteeing anyone here will be very happy with mediocre Houston athletics that fails to draw fans or provide any sort of competition.

All of those things are completely unaddressed in this ‘article’ for the Cougars.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 9:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Wouldn't be a geographic extreme for the conference

If that’s the case then we are already at a geographic extreme with TCU. It’s not much more of a stretch then what we did with TCU when we invited them.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 25, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

It is though

Houston would be on the edge of the conference. UTEP would be closer to the middle.

Yes, TCU is the current geographical extreme, but that doesn’t mean adding a new geographical extreme is a great idea. Next someone could be saying, “Hell, Memphis isn’t that much farther than Fort Worth.”

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Disagree with something about UH

1) The old stadium have been remodel 2 year ago. Second, breaking ground for 40k-50k stadium next year.

2) The climate is the same all over Texas. Look at Texas at Austin.

3) Extreme only to your mind and thinking.

4) Houston is the best recruiting city in the nation. All BIG school recruit them like the BIG 12.

5) Home game been full house last season. UH alumni have step-up now.

6) Sumlin have a large pay increase this season. I doubt he leave soon.

7) The school is transforming from commute to more on campus living.

8) The population of student body have increase every year.

9) The campus look so different that old alumni can’t even recognized it anymore.

10) There are 4 new building just complete and 2 new parking garage. The master plan just a start….etc.

by doan4u on Aug 25, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Response

1.) Um.. the ‘remodeling’ was 4 years ago, and it was for the Houston Dynamo, Houston’s MLS team (who also put up the money for it). ‘Remodeled’ is also a stretch when it was $1.7 million for a scoreboard, videowall, and lighting.

2.) Are you on drugs? The climate in Texas is certainly not the same all over. Houston is one of the most humid places in the country, whereas El Paso is dry much like most of the MWC schools.

3.) Um, no, extreme by definition. It would be on the extreme boundary of the conference. Perhaps you have an alternate definition of what you think ‘extreme’ means?
(Dictionary.com definition: “farthest from the center or middle; outermost; endmost: the extreme limits of a town.”)

4.) Houston is among the best recruiting cities in the country, yes. However, you do not need to have a team in Houston to recruit there, and having a team there is not significant in the grand scheme of things.

5.) Home games were not “full house” last season. Houston only averaged 25,242 in a stadium that seats 32,000. Unless your definition of “full” is 78%, then no. They also only had 1 sellout in 6 games, and that was against Texas Tech (me thinks there were a lot of Red Raiders fans there; just a hunch)

6.) If you don’t think Sumlin’s leaving at some point, you haven’t been following college football long. He’ll take the first good opportunity that comes along.

7.) The school is ‘transforming’ about as much as North Texas is. When you’re a school that large, it takes a lot more effort than UH and UNT are putting forth.

8.) The student body population increasing actually solidifies the ‘commuter school’ label. Do you really think they’re building so many dorms that it’s doing a lot of chipping at the off-campus housing %?

9.) That’s a subjective opinion. Nevertheless, UH looked more or less the same the last time I saw it a few years ago as it did when I was a kid.

10.) 4 new buildings for a campus of 37,000 isn’t much. My alma mater just completed 4 or 5 buildings itself, and is about 3/4ths of the size of UH. Whoopty-do.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice

All of those personal attacks really drive your point home. Good work buddy.

by gwmilks on Aug 31, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Stop doing your crappy research online and visit Texas

1. I guess you don’t live in Texas to know anything
2. The remodel wasn’t for Houston Dynamo. You haven’t a clue or correct ideas of remodeling.
3. The weather is same everywhere in Texas. The only different is it more hill country west Texas.
4. The stadium only hold 32k. so it much a sold out. Texas Raider was less 30-40 individual that if you count football player too.lol We kick there butt.lol
5.Sumlin justt got a pay increase. I doubt he leave us.
6. Texas North is a small campus. You been smoking weed.lol
7. Student body is close to 35-40k, talk on buddy. We expect 45k next couple year.
8. I just say 4 new building for next fiscal year. Go check our master plan.
9. Research before you speak your nonsense. It just a start.
10. Please don’t tell me stadium wasn’t pack this last two home game 2010. lol

by doan4u on Sep 14, 2010 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

They aren't breaking ground next year- as far as I know-

But Im pretty sure they are still trying to secure financing. Need the loot before you start digging.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

More C-USA - MWC merger talk-

Hate to link to my site- but- long story short- the ECU Chancellor said both conferences “seem very anxious” to get a merged title game done. Emphasized a lot of work to do to get it into writing but that a play-in game seems to be what the two leagues want right now.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 25, 2010 12:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Why Not Houston

VA Libertarian stated 3 of 4 Houston’s victories over SEC teams
were against Miss. State.
True, but the other one was over LSU. Not a bad team.
In 2007, if Houston completed a pass on the last play of the game,
it would have defeated Alabama on Alabama’s home field.
Their not a bad team either.

I posted on the MWC site because Houston and some MWC teams are in similar situations.
Over time, they may help each other.

All I want to say to “VA Libertarian” is “Down boy, your fresh bone will be there soon”.

by since1670 on Aug 25, 2010 12:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Um....

In 1999 (the year Houston topped LSU), the LSU Tigers were 3-8 with a 1-7 record in the SEC. Two of their 3 wins were against doormats North Texas and San Jose State. Again, hardly admirable.

Also, “if” doesn’t count in sports. And the 2007 Alabama football team went 7-6, with one of their losses at home to Louisiana-Monroe. It’s not like you almost beat the powerhouse that exists today.

You can dance around the facts all you want, but it doesn’t change them.

All I want to say to “since1670” is “I know how to read a sports almanac. Nice try, though.”

by VA Libertarian on Aug 25, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why Not Houston

Every argument for adding Houston to the MWC has been disputed.

Unless I read it incorrectly, analysis by rebelfan1 indicates adding Houston
provides 3-4 million additional dollars to every MWC team annually.
Please, correct this if I read it incorrectly.

http://www.mwcconnection.com/2010/8/23/1637047/my-idea-of-whats-really-going-on

My idea of what’s really going on in this round of expansion

I like many Houston fans am not sure this would result in a good situation
for Houston, but I did want to provide some information about the school
and its athletics. I also don’t know if it has to be Houston to the exclusion
of other school(s).

I wonder how this analysis will be disputed?

by since1670 on Aug 26, 2010 8:22 AM PDT reply actions  

not quite

I’m having trouble believing that the television deal would go up by $36-48 million just because the Houston market was added. I don’t think so. The idea that adding UH would make East Coast providers want to jump on board is a leap in logic as well, to say the least. TCU and Boise State are two teams most of the country wants to watch (not Houston), and BYU has a national following. If the television deal gets better, it’ll probably have more to do with those factors than it will adding the Cougars.

The fact that few people in Houston even care about the Cougars, even when they’re good (they’re what – the 6th or 7th most popular team in the area right now? Maybe lower?), makes the idea that they’re going to have this significant television impact sound ridiculous.

The fact remains that the MWC can still negotiate with ESPN for a better deal if they want it, with or without Houston. The Mtn. is a good vision, but the conference isn’t going to have the resources to make it great any time soon, and it will always struggle to be carried nationally. It was formed mainly out of response to MWC schools not wanting to play on the odd nights (Wednesday, Tuesday, for example) that ESPN had been requesting.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's not where most of the money is going to come from

since1670 misread my analysis, most of that money will come from the BCS when we become and AQ Conference. Adding the Houston market brings in $1-2 extra million. This is because Comcast has agreed to extend all three of the MWC’s channel’s reach into Texas and the East Coast if they add the Houston Market. Yes, I know no one will watch, but it will be part of a sports package that Comcast offers. No it is not the one with all the channels that no one cares about. It will be on the same package as the Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL Networks. Now if I"m not mistaken, those are some pretty popular channels and most people subscribe to the package not just one of the channels in that network. That means that even though the people in the East Coast and Texas don’t want to watch The Mtn, they still will be subscribing to it.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 26, 2010 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting info on Comcast-

You know more about their role in this than anybody I’ve found online. Here’s a question. Many MWC fans seem deadset on the idea that Houston increases the likelihood the MWC gets an AQ. How do Nevada and Fresno do in that capacity? Don’t they both weaken the league’s hopes an an AQ more than any gain UH might provide?

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Houston wouldn’t even join until 2012, which is after the period for BCS evaluation anyway. Looking forward, a team like Houston is just as likely to be a liability as they are to be an asset in future evaluations. They’re not a historically strong program – they’re just going through a mini-boom of on-field success right now.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Out of curiosity

Where did you find the figures/story for that? I’m not doubting you, but I haven’t seen anything outside of rumor when it comes to stuff like that, and I’d like to verify that East Coast providers would then be picking up Mtn.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

It has been confirmed

that Craig Thompson flew to Comcast’s headquarters on the East Coast and what came out of the meeting was that if the Houston Market was added, the MWC’s channels would get coverage expanded to Texas and the East Coast. The reason Comcast does this is to get the TV deal for BYU better. If BYU leaves, the amount of money Comcast makes goes way down. By making the contract better for the MWC’s side of the bargain, they make it more attractive for BYU to stay, therefore making sure they don’t start losing money on the MWC Deal.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 27, 2010 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Houston Cougars Popularity

“The fact that few people in Houston even care about the Cougars…”

If no one cares, why have their seasons tickets doubled this year
and why will they be on television at least 11 times this season?

by since1670 on Aug 26, 2010 11:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Couple of points to ponder, since1670

First and foremost, the best article I’ve found on this subject say ticket sales have increased 47%, not doubled. I’ll grant you that they’re likely higher since that article (because the article I found was dated from about 3 weeks ago), but not substantially.
“”http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/college/houston/7139798.html" >As of Wednesday afternoon, UH reported paid season-ticket sales of 9,243 — a 47-percent increase over the 2009 season. "

With that in mind…. 9,243? Are you f’n kidding me? You guys only sold 6,000 season tickets last year…. UTEP basektball nearly out-sold you (5,100). That’s barely more than SMU football (who is at about 7,500). It’s also about 60% of what TCU’s doing (they’re around 17,000), less than half of the best ticket sales figures in your conference (East Carolina and UCF both cruised past 20,000).

The most recent figure I can find for UTEP is 21,175 from 2006, as for whatever reason they’re a motherf*cker to google. Needless to say, I’m going to keep searching, and I can all but guarantee they’re significantly higher than Houston’s.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

In Fact

New Mexico State outsold y’all last year, with 7,300 tickets (yes, the same NMSU team that went 3-10 while playing in the WAC).

Thanks for bringing up Houston Cougar season ticket sales – I never even thought of using this metric to prove how little the team is cared about. Fantastic.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Correction

That NMSU figure was from 2008. Last year, they were actually over 8,000, which is even better.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Found UTEP's 2008 figure

Still can’t find 2009 or 2010.

But in 2008, coming off a 4-8 2007 campaign, season ticket sales were at least 24,059.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

now that byu says it will stay in the mwc. (on espn) i think we should invite houston first.

i think it’s a 50/50 they would come b/c i think that the sec has called them too. utep would be our next choce and i think they take us up on the invite. la. tech says they want to play near home in conference usa. good trade off. thompson needs to pull the trigger again.

I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.

by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

The SEC and Houston?

No Effn Way, Dude. Have you seen an SEC stadium? And to say that LSU is going to play in front of 24,000 at Robertson is insane. There is absolutely no way Houston has a chance at the SEC or the Big 12 right now.

Trading UH for La Tech is not an equal trade. I really, don’t see the MWC stealing a team with all this merger talk still strong. I think the MWC, sadly, is stuck with Utah State or maybe Hawaii if they want to hit 12.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

There’s no way the SEC is going after a team that struggled to sell 6,000 season tickets last year, and can’t even sell out a 32,000-seat stadium.

I went to a mid-tier SEC school (South Carolina) that regularly sells about 10x that number. Hell, South Carolina still averaged over 70,000 fans over the course of two seasons where they were a combined 1-21. Houston falls to about 15,000 fans when they’re mediocre – I can’t even imagine what they’d look like at two years of 1-21.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

houston might go 13-1 this year. lest see how many people come to the stadium towards the end of that season.

I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.

by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you really think that matters?

Shouldn’t every team be able to sellout when it goes 13-1?

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think people realize just how far away Houston is from BCS caliber

In regards to infrastructure and money. I think few teams have ever gained more notoriety from a 9-4 season and a C-USA runner up designation. I’m not saying UTEP blows UH out of the water and in football UH right now has a better squad (though UTEP beat them last year), I’m just saying that UH is a bit of a mirage around here.

From far away, they look like the Texas Longhorns (Houston presence, million dollar stadium expansion, recruiting hotbed) but when you get closer you see a commuter school with no local support, no money to have working showers, and a $400 marketing budget for it’s basketball program. Seriously.

MWC Fans, if you want to get a sense of how much UH struggles economically, read this article from the Houston Chronicle from March. Excerpt below.

Of course, Penders and Maggard came to those terms knowing full well UH has among the worst basketball facilities in C-USA. For the better part of the past six years, players haven’t been able to shower in the Hofheinz locker room because of plumbing issues.
“I’ve never used the shower since I’ve been here,” junior guard Zamal Nixon said. “I’ve been here and gotten to see other schools’ locker rooms on the road, I was like, `Wow.’ You can’t worry about what other people have. Just be thankful for the things that you have.”
Penders’ salary is barely half what first-year Memphis coach Josh Pastner commands annually ($880,000). The 2009 financial report that UH filed with the NCAA revealed a basketball marketing budget of $400, making the team the tree falling in the forest with nobody around to hear it. The average attendance of 3,178 this season is the lowest since 2003-04.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I should add that the support there (3,178 fans per home game)

Is for a team that won the C-USA Tournament and went to the NCAA Tournament. That’s the kind of presence UH has in Houston and among their own fans- 3,178 fans at a basketball game.

Those of us in Texas know- and I’m not exaggerating- that marginal high school football games will get more fans than that across the state.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

What blows my mind

Is that people dismiss the idea of a Boise State being in the Pac-10 or another BCS conference, but over-hype the crap out of Houston. What, just because Houston’s in a huge market? That makes no sense. They’re arguably the 4th (at best) most popular college football team in the area (behind A&M, Texas, Tech, and maybe even LSU), they have no money to match their ambition, and they’re a Tier II commuter school.

Boise State’s basically the same school (Tier II commuter) with a similar-sized stadium, but they have much better fan support and a consistent track record. And yet, nobody would really hype them up to a major conference the way people hype up Houston (to the SEC? F’n really?!?!?!?).

This just boggles my mind.

What happens when SMU has a few good years again? Are people going to go bat-shit crazy over the Mustangs then? They’re in an even larger market, after all, and they’re actually a good academic school with lots of money and resources. [Disclaimer: I am not promoting SMU, I’m merely making a point]

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

Just think if conference realignment took place 5 years ago. Fresno State would have surely gotten the first MWC invite over Boise St. Hell, Boise St wouldn’t even be in the conversation five years ago.

Methinks BCS money and status are causing the mid-major conferences to make shortsighted decisions. If a playoff system was in place, I think the WAC, MWC, & C-USA could easily sit down and make three solid conference based on the best cultural and geographical fit. There wouldn’t have to be all these shady backroom deals or feelings of betrayal.

by Smoove V on Aug 27, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I couldn't agree more

A playoff system would be best for student-athletes as well.

Having played sports in college (admittedly, club rugby, but club is the highest level for rugby and Division I is quite competitive), I can tell you that travel can really wear and tear on people. I much preferred playing schools in NC and GA (I was in SC) than traveling across the South to play in Arkansas (which took us like 16 hours each way).

by VA Libertarian on Aug 27, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

The decisions are shortsighted for sure,

but to be fair to Boise, they were worth an invite 5 years ago. By then, they had established themselves as a consistent top-20 team in the rankings. Obviously it wasn’t until the Oklahoma game that everybody believed they were for real, but the proof was already there.

by David Hooper on Aug 27, 2010 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

And in terms of facilities- it's not even close

The Sun Bowl is phenomenal- 52,000 plus- with new updates.

And in Basketball, last year UTEP opened up the Foster-Stevens basketball complex- I challenge you all to find a nicer facility in the MWC or C-USA for basketball practice. It’s stunning- check the picture gallery HERE. Suffice it to say, the showers work.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Basketball

UTEP almost had more basketball season-ticket sales than Houston had football season-ticket sales last year. And with Tim Floyd at the helm, I expect the next few years to be even better. He’s a great recruiter – people forget he had Kirk Hinrich and Nick Collison lined up for Iowa State before he bolted for the Bulls.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

UNLV

just broke ground on what is being called the best basketball practice facility in the country. Should be ready in a couple of years when UTEP would show up to town.

Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by rebelfan1 on Aug 27, 2010 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

i believe you. you get the texas news much better than me.

i just think thompson should invite either houston or utep to make 12 teams for 2011 and not usu.

I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.

by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

i saw somewhere that houston was expanding their stadium with 100 million dollars

that not true?

I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.

by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not true at all

They’re talking about tearing down Robertson and replacing it with a 40-50,000 seat stadium for $120 million, but there’s been absolutely zero talk of how they’d get the money for that.

Again, this is a school that only sold about 6,000 season tickets last year, and might make it to 11,000 this year because of last year’s record and this year’s hype. They don’t have the type of money to pretend they’re one of the big boys – Hell, they can’t even get near teams in their own conference in terms of season ticket sales (ECU claims to have sold about 30,000 this year, for example).

by VA Libertarian on Aug 26, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

They don't have the funding they need yet.

That is years away, from everything people around here have been saying.

by holly96 on Aug 26, 2010 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Read post from above

To get a real sense of where UH is financially- I think it will absolutely shock you.

by Adrian Mac on Aug 26, 2010 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm more impressed with you UTEP fans every day.

Your passion for your argument is wonderful to see. That, and you make some great points.

Right now, I’m leaning more towards UTEP than Houston for the geographic and cultural reasons. Besides, if the MWC wants to deepen their claws into Texas recruiting, it’d be a lot easier to pull off in the West than Houston.

by David Hooper on Aug 26, 2010 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

As swayed as I am by Adrian Mac and VA Libertarian...

The fact remains that the buy out for C-USA is draconian and no one can afford to pay it. That’s the reason we are getting saddled with the worst possible option in USU.

by NC Ute on Aug 27, 2010 4:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Is Houston Rising?

Fortunately, for Houston Cougar fans some
of the numbers presented in these posts are
out of date. What these numbers represent is
just how much athletics had been allowed to
languish. For decades the athletic department
had little or no support from the administration.
As example, the $400 marketing budget for basketball
was true. Its not difficult to imagining a fan saying
"if that’s all its worth to them, why should I
care". With little financial support from the
administration, the fans deserted the programs.

It has taken a long time to build it to its present
state. Fans are returning. Football attendance was up
17% in 2009 over 2008. I have seen numbers on the
latest season tickets, but can’t find them now. The
last one was approximately double the prior year.
There is good reason to expect attendance to be up
again this year.

Recruiting is up: 2008(100), 2009(61), and 2010(45)
by Rivals.com.

Financial support is up. There has been a lot of
spending in the last year.

The quality of coaches is up. Sumlin is definitely
an improvement over Briles. When Penders did not
build the basketball program where metrics showed
sustainable improvement, he was replaced. When
Noble’s program fell, he was replaced by Todd Whitting
from the successful TCU program.

At last, people are beginning to believe the program
is headed in the right direction and there is confidence
in the leadership. No one expects an invite from an
automatic qualifiying conference. But, expectations for
wins are sky high. Recruiting is up, support is up,
attendance is up. Fans don’t just think they can have
good seasons. They now expect to dominate CUSA, not just
this year, but every year.

UH president Dr. Renu Khator said: "I want the University
of Houston to be Tier One, which includes Tier One
academically and Tier One athletically".
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/college/houston/6821653.html

Mack Rhoades was hired as athletic director June 11,
2009. I think he was promised support to do what he
believed necessary. "Reading between the lines"
I believe he looked at the history and said "we’ll see".
He did not sign his contract until more than a year passed.
During that year, he made five head coaching changes,
re-did the contracts of three others, and made numerous
other changes including repairing the showers.

Forget the $400. The buyouts for Tom Penders and
Rayner Noble were each in the hundreds of thousands.
The study for new football and basketball facilities
cost $250,000.

After his first year, Sumlin’s contract was renegotiated.
His buyout decreases if UH does not break ground on a
stadium project by Jan. 3, 2011. It appears both
Mack Rhoades and Kevin Sumlin are playing hard ball.

It seems unlikely, the president would set this in motion
and then withdraw support. The AD is doing exactly what
he was hired to do. She intensely wants Tier One in academics
and athletics and has worked hard on the state funding and on
efforts to build research dollars. They have worked hard to
build the quality of the colleges and departments. Now, with
state funding, rising to Tier One academically is realistic.

Cougar fans are delighted with the events that
are occurring. When UTEP arrives at Robertson stadium
on September 10, they will be greeted by a sea of red
in a rockin full stadium.

The efforts and resources for Tier One academically are:


Texas House Bill 51 authorizes vote on money to create Tier One universites


Voters Approve Tier One Funds – a clear road map to reach the next level


How close is UH to Tier One

by since1670 on Aug 27, 2010 7:50 AM PDT reply actions  

It's amazing what winning can do for a program.

Utah is a great example of that. Twenty years ago the stadium sat like 35k and was MADE OF WOOD! (ok, probably not entirely but still) But when they brought in Mac and started winning popular support swing in the direction of investing in the program, which increased success, which in turn fed more fuel to the fire of fan support and so on.

by NC Ute on Aug 27, 2010 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

There’s no way “the last [# for season tickets] one was double the prior year” unless you’re talking 2010 to 2009. However, the way you’re sentence is structured, by adding “There is good reason to expect attendance to be up again this year,” seems to imply you were talking about 2009 doubling 2008. If so, that’s really sad, because 2009 only had about 6,000 season tickets sold. Are you saying 2008 only had 3,000 season tickets sold, or are you being intentionally misleading?

Also, in regards to athletic funding, you’ve stated, “Financial support is up. There has been a lot of spending in the last year.” This does not say anything about athletic funding – it merely talks about athletic debt. Where’s the funding? You’ve given plenty of links to academic funding, but none to athletic funding.

Moreover, UTEP has also received the funding for Tier I academics (note that your links often talk about stepping up to Tier One for multiple universities in Texas). However, UTEP is still not a commuter school like Houston is. Edge (slightly)? UTEP still.

You also said, “Forget the $400. The buyouts for Tom Penders and Rayner Noble were each in the hundreds of thousands. The study for new football and basketball facilities cost $250,000.”
Um… okay. Nothing about expensive buyouts implies that athletic funding has increased. The fact remains that the $400 budget exists/existed. If anything, it appears as though the athletic department is just taking on debt. Also, they barely raised the funds to pay for that study, if I recall…. a scant $250K. How on Earth do you expect them to raise $160 million?

And “rockin’ full stadium”? You guys sold out exactly one game last year, and that was when Texas Tech came to town – a team debatably more popular than UH in Houston.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 27, 2010 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

One thing we can all keep in mind:

never underestimate the passion of West Texas for their local football teams. It’s been a fascinating debate.

by David Hooper on Aug 27, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is Houston moving to MWC a good thing?

VA Libertarian
Let me preface this by writing that I don’t know for sure whether a move to the Mountain West Conference would be good for the University of Houston or for the MWC. To my way of thinking, the college football landscape is changing so much that, in a few years, we probably won’t recognize it . Where there is now one Notre Dame, soon there will be one ND and a bunch of wanna bees i.e. Texas, BYU, USC etc. The list goes on. Seems like every good size school fancies itself a Notre Dame. Maybe UT or BYU can draw a national audience. I doubt it but who knows? My guess is that while there are, at best, a dozen or so teams who now have the consistent possibility of playing for a National Championship, in the future there will be less. The wanna bees and ND will form something akin to a super conference of independents. If the wanna bees succeed, then the real conference affiliations that are left will likely exist to divide a shrinking football pie. It took 15 or so years for those left out of the BCS to bang down the current BCS door. It will probably take much longer to break down the next.

That being said, I don’t understand, VA Libertarian, why you insist on promoting the MWC prospects (no pun intended) of UTEP seemingly at the sole expense of the University of Houston. What did Houston do to you? If UTEP can bring more to the table so be it. If they are not yet ready, take heart, they still might be in a few years. For now though, no offense to the many fine Miner alums, Texas El Paso simply is not in the same class as Houston. Not academically (as you submit) , nor athletically (as you suggest) and not as a city (as you advocate). And all of the shouting (and cussing) you do won’t change that.

First academics:
You seem to dismiss the fact that Houston has several nationally ranked academic departments. I must ask, which departments at UTEP are ranked? According to the Princeton Review, Houston ranks ahead of UTEP in pretty much every academic category you can name. Without boring everyone here with stats, you claim to be able to read an almanac, look it up for yourself: http://www.princetonreview.com/

Now to athletics.
You seem to reject the U of H, claiming that they are a “commuter school” which nobody in Houston cares about. And because Texas Western won a basketball championship in 1966, that makes them better. You want to dis the Cougars’ 16 National Championships in golf. Soooo, I suppose that no one, including you, has ever heard of Bill Rogers, Steve Elkington, or Bruce Lietzke? How about John Mahaffey or Fred Couples? Or, more to the point, you claim the 4 recent football wins against SEC opponents mean little or are somehow tainted. I must ask, in the last 20 years, have the Miner’s gotten within 40 points of an SEC football opponent? What about about UTEP’s record against the Big XII? Isn’t it true that last year alone Houston beat more Big XII opponents then UTEP has in their entire football history? If you want to run with the big boys you have to show that you can beat them. You assert that UTEP, from El Paso, can out draw Houston. So what. While El Paso is a nice and, in places, pretty city it is also a border town. It’s nowhere near the dynamic, world class city that is Houston. Help me out, where is the growth potential in El Paso? I know you are passionate about promoting your alma matter but let’s, for a moment, assume they could get all of the fans and all of the TV’s in the Greater El Paso Area. And, lets assume that ten years down the road the numbers doubled or even tripled. It would still have little to no effect on the MWC’s television package. Isn’t TV money what’s driving this whole re-alignment thing?

Lastly, on the one hand you want to dismiss Houston as a boring, nothing to do city while on the other, you claim that the Cougars can’t draw because there are "6 or 7 options ahead of them". Which is it? Of course there is allot to do in Houston. And, of course this will water down the U of H’s fan base. Frankly though, the biggest problem the Cougars have isn’t the sports options in Houston, it’s the fact that UT, A&M and to a lesser extent Tech, don’t want to share the pie that is Houston recruiting and the dollars it provides. And yes, recruiting is a huge factor. Your answer to this seems to be no more then something akin to “no it isn’t”. Well, yes it is, despite the fact that some recruits slip out of Texas. You submit that because there are Houston players on teams around the country, that those same teams wouldn’t be better off by playing in Houston. Really? That’s what you want to go with? In fact, there is a reason that so many Big XII teams and others schedule games at or in Houston. Rice never has a problem filling their schedule :-). Fact is, playing in Houston can help any Coach who knows what to do with a personal appearance. Do you really believe that a Coach in Idaho has the same recruiting advantage in Houston as a Coach from Lubbock playing in Houston? If the MWC wants to compete nationally against conferences like the Big XII, and grab onto a BCS auto bid, than it will have to establish a Texas base. Like it or not, that’s where the TV’s are. TCU alone can’t make this happen. For all of it’s many positives, can UTEP really help the Mountain West do that? The U of H has won at the highest levels before, is winning now and will do so again. Let the Cougars get out from under the thumbs of A&M and UT and it will be interesting to see what they can achieve. Will a move to the Mountain West help them accomplish this? Who knows, but I’m betting that the University of Houston, located in the nation’s 4th largest city, is a sleeping giant and is probably worth a look, at least, from any conference.

by pcprof on Aug 27, 2010 9:48 PM PDT reply actions  

This is getting tiresome

First and foremost, it’s apparent that you’re reading comprehension is either lacking, or you haven’t been following this entire argument.

I never said UTEP was a better school. I’ve maintained that academics have more or less been a wash, and citing the success of one program or another is a game that virtually any school can play. Moreover, it’s generally an amateur’s game when it comes to academic comparison. The fact remains that UTEP and Houston are both Tier II schools. The fact that Houston is also a commuter school is why I ding it.

Next, UTEP has won more than just the 1966 basketball championship. Obviously you missed the part where it’s tied for 10th among all Division I schools for most men’s national championships, with 21 total. They’ve done it in 4 different events (basketball, cross-country, indoor track & field, and outdoor track & field), which is definitely more than Houston can say. I also maintain that Don Haskins’ 1966 team is infinitely more important than Phi Slama Jama (which never could win the big one).

I also firmly believe that UTEP could very well have beaten LSU in a 3-9 season for the Tigers, and that beating Mississippi State isn’t something that anyone should really be proud of. In some years there are probably Texas 5A high school teams that could put a whooping on the Bulldogs. We’re talking about a team that has recently lost to Tulane, Louisiana Tech, UAB, Maine (yes, FCS school Maine), Vanderbilt, Troy, etc. So, no, Houston does not get credit from me for winning 4 games against opponents with a combined 13-34 record during the seasons of defeat. Hell, if you want to get technical, Houston’s only been 3-2 versus UTEP (including a loss to the Miners last year), so I don’t think their recent success is that all that spectacular. Moreover, I never attempted to say UTEP has been a better football team. I’ve merely noted that Houston’s football success isn’t enough to overcome their flaws, and that their success is mostly hype-filled and overrated.

Now, onto your next ‘rant.’ You claim I’m passionate about “promoting [my] alma mater.” This really proves you aren’t paying attention. Not only did I not go to UTEP, I’ve stated countless times that I went to South Carolina – a fact that is also evident by taking an even cursory glance at my profile. Hell, I didn’t even grow up a UTEP fan – I just think they’re a much better fit for the MWC, and that the Houston hype machine needs a little taming. Now, admittedly, I’ve pulled for UTEP on the field at times within C-USA, but they’re not even my favorite team there – SMU is (I grew up north of Dallas).

As for your dismissal of El Paso, I’m just going to go out on a limb and assume you’ve never spent significant time there. I’m also going to guess that you’ve spent an unhealthy amount of time in Houston. Look, friend, when I lived in Dallas I thought it was fantastic, too – Hell, Houston and Dallas have a lot in common, and at the time I thought they were both ‘world-class.’ But now that I’ve traveled and moved around a lot, I see both cities for what they are: dry, cookie-cutter crap without any real cultural ‘it’ factor. If you want to see some culture in Texas, I wholeheartedly suggest you travel to Fort Worth, Austin, or El Paso. There’s more to do in those cities than go to the same lame corporate bars, chain restaurants, and ‘cool downtown things’ that are in every other major city. The coolest thing in Houston is probably NASA, but even that wasn’t that fun to do, honestly. If you go to El Paso, in contrast, few of the restaurants are major chains, the bar scene is fantastic, the music is amazing, and the city feels alive. Sitting in downtown Houston feels little different than sitting in downtown Dallas, Phoenix, Nashville, etc., aside from the overbearing pollution and humidity that are part of Houston’s charm.

Also, there’s no inconsistency between claiming the Cougars are at best the 6th-most popular team in town and that Houston is a cultureless, cookie-cutter city. It’s not that there’s ‘nothing to do’ in Houston – it’s that the things too do is more or less the same crap you can do in a lot of major cities, but without the unique cultural things some other major cities (say, Chicago or Miami) have. If anything, that makes it even more pathetic that the Cougars draw so poorly. They’re at best the 3rd-most popular college team in town, and I’d easily assert that they’re probably really 4th, as Tech is at least as popular as well.

Finally, no team in discussion here is really going to help with the BCS numbers, because they wouldn’t be a part of the conference until after the evaluation period. As for the next evaluation period, it’s just as likely that Houston once again tanks it on the field and goes back to having barely 15,000 fans again as it that they remain at the level they’re at.

My arguments for UTEP center around the ideas that:
a.) Houston’s recent success won’t be lasting
b.) Even with Houston’s success, they can’t draw a crowd for piss (they ranked 80th in FBS attendance last year, with a pathetic 6,000 season tickets sold)
c.) The academics are about the same as UTEP, but Houston is a commuter school, and
d.) Neither school will factor into the BCS evaluation

Furthermore, my primary points for UTEP are as follows:
1.) There’s a history of reckless expansion that doesn’t always have the best long-term goals of the conference at heart, so ignore recent flares of success
2.) UTEP has a long history with over half of the teams in the conference, whereas Houston only has a history with TCU
3.) UTEP has vastly better attendance in both football and basketball – the only two money sports, and is more consistently followed by their fans, especially in down years. The 5-year average between the schools, where Houston has had 5 winning seasons and UTEP has had 1, still sees UTEP nearly double Houston in terms of average attendance
4.) UTEP is a much better geographic fit, as it’s much closer to more MWC schools. Houston, in contrast, would be on the extreme edge of the conference, and would be expensive and time-consuming to travel to.
5.) Hispanics are the fastest growing future demographic, and they love UTEP way more than they love the Cougars
6.) UTEP has 21 men’s Division 1 national championships in 4 sports; Houston has 16 in 1.
7.) There’s a massive hypocrisy factor for MWC fans who’ve cried about ‘the game’ now trying to play ‘the game’ by looking at Houston more as a market than as a conference partner
8.) When Sumlin leaves, the MWC will really regret adding Houston, as they’ll inevitably fall back to their historic levels of mediocrity and fan disinterest.

The Case for UTEP over Houston here.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 27, 2010 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Forgive my "tiresomness".

The aforementioned post was my first and there were allot of posts to read before this one so I just skimmed some of them. I tuned out about the time the cussing started.

Lets talk
¶ 1. "I never said UTEP was a better school…"
Maybe you can help me with my comprehension. On August 25th you said about the U of H: "For 95% of the students there, the academics are poor." Where does this figure come from? And, how is it an "amateur’s game" to suggest that the academic record of Houston far out shines that of UTEP? Because you will lose that argument? If I’m wrong, show me where.

¶ 2. "Next, UTEP has won more than just the 1966 basketball championship…"
Man, I hate to get into this argument because I really liked that team but, since you brought it up. "Infinitely more important"? That’s a stretch. Any of the guys on the ‘66 team make it in the NBA? Maybe one? Another of them, I seem to recall made the Globe Trotters.
Phi Slamma Jama set the tone for up tempo college basketball that is still being played today. Nuf said.
Also, there are allot of fans around the country that believe what put college basketball on the map was the so called "Game of The Century" in ‘67 at the Astrodome between UCLA and Houston. 50,000 plus in attendance (most probably pulling for UCLA – right?) and a national TV audience.

 ¶ 3. "I also firmly believe that UTEP could very well have beaten…"
Welp, here is my comprehension problem kicking in again. 5A high schools? Really? What I’m hearing is a bunch of woulda, shoulda, coulda. The U of H did! And, I’m hearing no mention of UTEP’s record against the Big XII. What was that again?

¶ 4. "Now, onto your next ‘rant."sic
Sorry about falsely aligning you with UTEP. You write like a Miner faithful :-)

¶ 5. "As for your dismissal of El Paso…"
I didn’t dis El Paso. I simply pointed out that it has nothing approaching the marketing power of Houston. Care to disagree?
Actually, I have business in El Paso on occasion and a few close friends who are from there. I like the Mexican food but the seafood sucks. If you can’t find a good local chain in Houston you don’t know where to look. How bout Ninfa’s (born a few blocks from the U of H campus). The bar scene on Westheimer is quirky but fun. Aside from the "bars" though maybe you can educate me. What major corporations are headquartered in El Paso? Exxon? No, that would be Houston. How bout Apache Corp, Marathon Oil, Shell, United Space Alliance, Schlumberger, MetroCorp Bancshares, James Coney Island or Shipley Donuts. Woops, those would all be Houston too. And, if you are sick, I’ll bet El Paso is the place to go. Right? Need I go on? While we’re on the subject I would think that a December trip to balmy Houston to play football would be quite pleasant compared to most places north of there.

¶ 6. "Also, there’s no inconsistency between claiming the Cougars…"
Maybe you have a source the rest of us don’t. How do you know how teams rank in popularity in Houston? Is there a list? As to "cultureless (sic) or cookie cutter?" Do I really need to provide links to the Houston Symphony, Houston Grande Opera or even the Miller Outdoor Theatre? Your boorishness is getting off putting. It makes you seem less intelligent then you might be.

¶ 7. "Finally, no team in discussion here is really…"
Again, how do you know this? If attendance is all you got you are barking up the wrong tree. For now at least, UTEP is about topped out. Houston may be behind but they can grow forever.

¶ 8. "My arguments for UTEP center around the ideas that…"
"a.) Houston’s recent success won’t be lasting"
How do you know? Crystal ball?

"b.) Even with Houston’s success, they can’t draw a crowd…"
If you would have read my post, I was talking about a huge potential and the possibility that the MWC and U of H can help each other. UTEP, despite your good intentions bring nada to the table in the way of growth potential or TV potential.

"c.) The academics are about the same"
Ha, only if you consider UTEP’s "amateur" standing :-)

"d.) Neither school will factor into the BCS evaluation…"
Maybe not this time but isn’t growth for the future what we are talking about? Is El Paso on a growth pattern that will catch Houston any time in this lifetime?

¶ 9. "Furthermore, my primary points for UTEP are as follows…"
"1.) There’s a history of reckless expansion that doesn’t always have the best long-term…"
Long term. Hmm, maybe my "comprehension" is getting the better of me again but I could have sworn that in my earlier post I wrote about the potential of El Paso vs. that of Houston and came to the conclusion that they weren’t even close. Not three lines ago you wrote of "long term expansion" now you’re against it. What’s up with that?

"2.) UTEP has a long history with over half of the teams in the conference, whereas Houston only has a history with TCU"
Yep, a long standing rivalry with the current conference champ. In a market the MWC desperately needs.

"3.) UTEP has vastly better attendance…"
C’mon, "vastly better"? Really? For 2009 UTEP averaged 29010. Houston averaged 25242 and had the 14th largest increase in the nation. Do you really believe that’s your best selling point? And how many TV sets can they bring to the table? Houston’s attendance is growing and will continue to grow. Also, what looks better on TV, 25K in a stadium that seats 32K or 29K in a stadium that seats 52K? Get real!

"4.) UTEP is a much better geographic fit…"
Really? The U of H campus is exactly 269.9 miles from that of TCU. Flight time, depending on the airline, from almost anywhere west to Houston Intercontinental would be about the same as to DFW.

"5.) Hispanics are the fastest growing future demographic, and they love UTEP way more than they love the Cougars…"
Again, how do you know this? Is this a joke? Most of the "Hispanics" I know like soccer and maybe the Houston Dynamo. BTW, Does El Paso have an MLS team? Didn’t think so.

"6.) UTEP has 21 men’s Division 1 national championships…"
Again, help me out, my "comprehension" is a little weak. UTEP’s last Cross Country Championship was in 1983 (that one was vacated and awarded to Wisconsin), before that it was 1981. Their last Indoor Track and Field Championship was in 1982, Their last Outdoor Track and Field Championship was in also in 1982. Boy, that oughtta help the MWC.
 
"7.) There’s a massive hypocrisy factor for MWC fans…"
Hypocrisy? You think it is hypocritical for the MWC to pick Houston because they think the U of H can help the Conference? Wow my logic must be as good as my comprehension.

"8.) When Sumlin leaves, the MWC will really regret adding Houston…"
Let me get this straight. You think Kevin Sumlin is more of a threat to leave Houston than Mike Price is to leave UTEP? And Sumlin’s leaving would have more of an impact at Houston then Price’s leaving would have at UTEP? I don’t know why but the word "hypocritcal" keeps coming into my head.

by pcprof on Aug 28, 2010 2:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Reading comprehension, man. Seriously.

Responses:

1.) Yes, if you’re a Tier II commuter school, most of your academics are poor, save for the programs that are actually good. Obviously, there aren’t that many good programs, or you wouldn’t otherwise be a Tier II school. Thus, all the programs that aren’t ranked are probably pretty poor.
As for the ’amateur’s game,’ you clearly don’t get it. Maybe that’s because you went to UH yourself? I said it’s an ’amateur’s game’ to cite certain program rankings and then pretend like it makes a university a great school. Sometimes, a school shouts “we’re #5 in New Media Sports Advertising!”…. despite the inconvenient fact that, perhaps, there are only 6 schools who offer that. If a school is Tier II overall, no bragging about it’s ‘rankings’ will suddenly not make it Tier II.

2.) This is further proof that you can’t think past tomorrow. Yes, TCU is the current champ. Do you think they’ll be the champ every year? No? Then I’ll take UTEP’s deep history with 6 of the schools over Houston’s deep history with 1 every day of the week.

3.) Again, UH’s SEC victories were against teams with a combined 13-34 record, with one of those teams notably losing to FCS Maine. I wouldn’t be bragging about that. As for UTEP’s record against the Big XII, it bears noting that they rarely play Big XII teams, and when they do it’s generally Texas, Oklahoma, and Tech. No shame in losing to those teams. I also think this record is largely irrelevant, because it’s not as though Houston has been a force comparatively.

4.) Try not to assume things when debating people.

5.) You really just don’t get it, do you? Why would any traveling fan care about what corporations are in Houston? Good for Houston – it’s a nice place to raise a family. It’s also a shitty place to visit. El Paso has a better nighlife scene for visitors, as it has a lot of uniqueness to it – not cookie-cutter corporate crap. It also has a better climate. If I was Wyoming and I had to make a September visit to El Paso or Houston, which do you think I’d rather do? Polluted, humid, cultureless Houston, or arid, beautiful, culture-rich El Paso?

6.) You really think the Cougars are more popular than: the Texans, Rockets, Astros, Longhorns, or Aggies? That puts UH at 6th – at best. I still think Tech may be more popular there, what with their vast alumni network, and in years when the Cougars are playing mediocre football, I’d bet the Dynamo are more popular as well. As for the ‘culture’ you’re citing, you kinda keep proving my point. :) Yes, you have museums and symphonies – just like every other major city. What Houston lacks is something like 6th Street in Austin, or Sundance Square and the Stockyards in Fort Worth, etc. All Houston has are the amenities you’d expect out of a major city… which, conveniently, are in every major city.

7.) You may want to re-read this and actually address the argument presented, what with your fancy UH educ-mah-cay-shun:
“Finally, no team in discussion here is really going to help with the BCS numbers, because they wouldn’t be a part of the conference until after the evaluation period. As for the next evaluation period, it’s just as likely that Houston once again tanks it on the field and goes back to having barely 15,000 fans again as it that they remain at the level they’re at.”
It doesn’t take a genius to realize that Houston wouldn’t join the conference until after the BCS evaluation period. That’s the main point of that argument. How do I know that? Because it’s fact. Secondly, since 1985, Houston has had 3 seasons with attendance over 25,000. I’d call that a pretty good historical trend to go by. UTEP, in comparison, usually has well over 30,000 every year, and has averaged 38,000 the past 5 seasons. Shit, UTEP actually sells out the 51,500 seat Sun Bowl far more often than Houston sells out the much-smaller 32,000 seat Robertson Stadium.

8a.) I don’t think you have a crystal ball, either. What, do you have special knowledge that their success will be perpetual? Winning in football is largely cyclical – unless you’re suggesting UH is on par with Texas, Ohio State, etc. (and even though schools go through droughts), you can’t seriously think they’ll keep winning forever. And history has shown that when UH isn’t competing for the C-USA championship, attendance hovers around 15,000 and the team is largely ignored. There are high schools in Dallas with better attendance than that.

8b.) Potential means little. ‘Potential’ is why the NHL moved to places like Phoenix, South Florida, Nashville, etc., and that hasn’t panned out too well for them. Moreover, Houston’s ‘potential’ is overrated, considering they’ll likely never be more than the 6th most popular team in town (sorry – it’s the truth. The pro teams will always be more popular, and so will UT and A&M. It’s the same way in DFW). Greater Houston’s only 6 million people, so even if they were given a 6th of that, it’d be about a million. However, that’s not really how markets divide. Seeing as they’re the 6th-ranked in terms of popularity, and not owners of a 6th-share, the market share available to them is likely under a half million. Why? Economics tells us that money spent on sports has a hierarchy to it, and most people will spend their money on the teams they like more ahead of Houston.
In El Paso, by comparison, the Miners are the top dog. Now, El Paso metro is 750,000 people, but that’s just El Paso metro. The combined region of El Paso-Juarez is 2.3 million and growing. Moreover, UTEP has a great hold of the hearts of many West Texas fans.

8c.) They’re both Tier II, how do you consider UTEP to be ‘amateur’ in comparison. I guess Houston, too, is ‘amateur’ then?

8d.) I wasn’t aware that ‘growth patterns’ had anything to do with BCS evaluation. Since neither of us know the future, it’s just as likely that UTEP and Houston will have the same impact on the next round of BCS evaluations in terms of win-impact. Despite your yearnings to the contrary, the BCS doesn’t care that Houston is a large market.

9-1.) Obviously, your comprehension is, in fact, failing you. When the WAC recklessly expanded to 16 teams back in the 90s, they did it for ‘market share’ – that’s why places like SMU (Dallas), San Jose State (San Jose), Rice (Houston), etc. were offered spots in the league. Quite evidently, that didn’t work out for them. Why? Because ‘capturing markets’ only matters if a team is even remotely popular in that market. UH isn’t now, and likely won’t be in the future, if history is any indication. The Cougars are only mildly popular when they’re successful, and they have dreadful support when they’re playing poorly. In contrast, UTEP keeps a pretty constant fanbase through good and bad, and are incredibly popular when they do well. Again, in 5 winning seasons, UH has still only averaged about half of what UTEP has averaged through 4 bad seasons and 1 good one.

9-2.) Again, a rivalry with TCU doesn’t overwhelm me compared to 6 rivalries for UTEP. Especially since TCU has similar issues to Houston (can’t draw with a damn – even in a season where they go undefeated and make it to the BCS).

9-3.) Yes, vastly better. 5-Year average for UTEP: 38,843. 5-Year average for Houston: 20,935. I’d say nearly doubly the Cougars is vastly better, yes. In the other money sport (basketball), UTEP does double UH, by a margin of 9,125 to 4,326.
And given that they can’t even sell out their stadium, and that they’re at best the 6th-most popular team in Greater Houston, I wouldn’t count on the Cougars bringing too many tv sets to the table.

9-4.) You don’t seem to realize that most teams in the MWC already hate the trip to Fort Worth. It’s long and arduous on them. They don’t need a guarantee that they’re going to do it every year in one sport, and at least twice in other sports. Also, those longer flights get expensive, as that’s a lot more gas to use. Yes, Houston’s close to TCU – bravo. They’re far away from the other 10 schools. UTEP, in comparison, is pretty close to a lot of them, being about 750 miles closer than Houston is and all.

9-5.) Are you disputing that Hispanics are the fastest growing demographic? Really? Are you just bigoted enough to think Hispanics only like soccer?

9-6.) Again, it’s a legacy argument. You only wish that Houston could win in something other than golf. Seriously… golf? How many people know that there even is NCAA golf?

9-7.) Price has been there 7 years, so yeah, he’s a safer bet. And by all indications, he’s much happier in El Paso than Sumlin is in Houston. Price has done the big game, and isn’t overly eager to play it again. Sumlin’s young and itchin’ for it, comparatively.

by VA Libertarian on Aug 28, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Typos be damned

I’m sure there’s a lot of them – I decided to quickly type this response before leaving for my rugby match. “doubly Houston,” for example, obviously should have been “doubling Houston.”

by VA Libertarian on Aug 28, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Under what conditions would Houston join the MWC?

Others may(probably do) have a different opinion, but mine is:

1. The MWC will not extend an invitation to the Cougars unless it would help in obtaining AQ status.
2. Houston would not join the MWC unless AQ status was a certainty.
3. Probably neither of the above will occur.
4. There is no poll, but my guess is a large majority of the Cougars fans don’t want to be in the MWC.
5. Houston will have an outstanding football season.
    Attendance will be up. Recruiting will be better. At least 10 TV appearances. BCS bowl?

Rivals 2010 Ranking
=====
 32 Utah
 40 Brigham Young
 45 Houston
 46 TCU
 52 Fresno State
 53 Southern Miss
 56 UCF
 57 Memphis
 58 Colorado State
 71 Marshall
 73 San Diego State
 73 Tulsa
 76 Southern Methodist
 79 East Carolina
 80 New Mexico
 82 Boise State
 83 UTEP
 91 UAB
 95 Nevada
100 UNLV
100 Wyoming
105 Rice
108 Air Force

There are facts and there are opinions. Generally, I prefer facts.

by since1670 on Aug 28, 2010 1:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I highly doubt UH goes to a BCS Bowl

Honestly, do you know anything about their defense? At all? This has nothing to do with realignment but I just think you might do yourself a favor to read my UH Preview. Their defense was really bad last year and they aren’t going to be much better with a new system coming in. They might win the C-USA, they are the favorites, but a BCS bowl- I just really don’t see it with that D.

UH PREVIEW

Here are there NCAA Ranks in Defense: REmember there are 120 schools- Look at these numbers and tell me UH is going BCS. Really, it would be great for C-USA if they did, but seriously look at these numbers. It’s not happening.

Total Defense 111
Scoring Defense 95
Rushing Defense 115
Pass Defense 72
Sacks 85

by Adrian Mac on Aug 29, 2010 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you?

Do you know anything about their defense? Unless I’m mistaken, there are not too many people who have seen it in action this year. You must be best friends with Brian Stewart.

by gwmilks on Aug 31, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Toward Tier One

Texas has two public Tier One Universities: Texas A&M University and University of Texas – Austin.
Approximately, 150 million research dollars annually are needed to obtain this status. Only one university
in Texas is over half way toward this goal(HOUSTON).

                                    Top 25 26-50 Research
                                    Measures Measures * $1000
Public Texas A&M University 7 2 543,888 14 228,363 21 6,259,791 3
Public University of Texas – Austin 7 2 446,765 20 289,331 12 6,895,038 2
Public University of Houston – University Park 3 73,542 108 40,116 113 596,925 37
Texas Tech University 57,878 169 123 Public
University of Texas – El Paso 39,965 190 141 Public

The Top American Research Universities

There are facts and there are opinions. Generally, I prefer facts.

by since1670 on Aug 28, 2010 1:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Just wondering

How many existing MWC schools are Tier 1? Honestly, do academics matter in conference realignment? Is that important to you?

by Adrian Mac on Aug 29, 2010 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Toward Tier One

Sorry folks, I cleaned it up for my friend.

Texas has two public Tier One Universities: Texas A&M University and University of Texas – Austin.
Approximately, 150 million research dollars annually are needed to obtain this status.
Only one university in Texas is over half way toward this goal(HOUSTON).

                                                                  Research
                                                                  * $1000
Public Texas A&M University 543,888
Public University of Texas – Austin 446,765
Public University of Houston – University Park 73,542
Texas Tech University 57,878
University of Texas – El Paso 39,965

The Top American Research Universities

There are facts and there are opinions. Generally, I prefer facts.

by since1670 on Aug 28, 2010 1:47 PM PDT reply actions  

VA Libertarian

So VA Lib
By now I’m sure you’ve read since1670‘s post on Academic’s. Any questions? Or, is your only response still some version of "…Tier II…"? Maybe it’s you who "don’t get it"!

As for the City of Houston vs other cities. You’ve mentioned "assuming things". Well, I don’t live in Houston, I’ve lived in Austin since 1980. And, I can tell you that no one I know would take a kid to 6th street after a football game or any other time. It can be fun but it’s also one of the most dangerous places in town. As I’ve said Houston is a world class city in every way. You want to belittle it but you are either speaking from ignorance or speaking to what you hope is ignorance. I can’t believe I actually have to do this but here is a link to several dozen clubs in Houston:
http://www.houston.com/nightlife/
None of them chains. Take a look, you might learn something or at least have a good time.
As for travel to Houston from MWC schools. A quick look at travelocity.com offers this:
A flight from Denver to Houston costs $224 and takes 2h 24min
A flight from Denver to El Paso costs $204 and takes 1h 44 min.
From Salt Lake to Houston costs $314 and takes 3h flat.
From Salt lake to El Paso costs $314 and takes 3h 44 min.
From Albuquerque to Houston costs $274 and takes 2h 2min.
From Albuquerque to El Paso costs $268 and takes 4h 4 min.
Need I go on? How about Vegas to Houston. Costs $304 and takes 2h 43min. To El Paso costs $304 and takes 3h 26 min. I didn’t cherry pick these to make a point, I picked the best available prices with the best available times to both cities.
In a word then, what increased travel cost? In dollars? In time? As I said, Houston is a big time city. That includes having a big time airport :-)

Now to athletics. You keep harping on attendance but, using your own numbers UTEP’s attendance was off somewhere north of 25% last year (5 year ave. of 38000 – 2009 – 29010) while Houston was up. You dubiously claim that the U of H can’t be supported in Houston because of so much sports competition yet consider this. Absent a miracle, the Astros season is over in September. The Texans play on Sunday usually on alternate Sundays from the U of H. But, for a minute lets say the Texans play the same weekend. Wouldn’t a UH vs TCU Saturday followed by a Texans vs whoever game Sunday make for a fun weekend? Even if there might be a scheduling conflict with the Rockets, the Toyota Center only seats 18,300. And, the Dynamo plays in Robertson stadium. Conflict? To assume that one can’t support the Texans, Astros along with the U of H is ludicrous. Austin is 180 miles from Houston while College Station is 100. I’ve already touched on Houston’s problem with the Aggies and the Longhorns and given it as the one reason this might be a good move for the Cougars. Did you get that Mr. comprehension? The one reason this might be a good move for the Cougars. You keep talking (wishing) about the "deep history" of UTEP football. Within the last 25 years (about the time of UTEP’s last "National Championship"… in track) Houston has beaten Texas, Texas A&M, Tech, Baylor, Oklahoma State, Missouri and Nebraska. They’ve also beaten, Miss. State, LSU, Illinois, Minnesota, Arizona State, UNC and Pitt. In short they’ve beaten teams from every BCS conference and most of the mid majors. Some of them multiple times. I know you want to belittle their accomplishments but c’mon, work with me here. Who has UTEP beaten? Son, I’m sorry to have to sound like I’m picking on UTEP but you are dreaming. The MWC is looking for help at the National level aiming at an automatic BCS bid. UTEP’s time may come, I hope it does, but at this time, UTEP is a barely a national minnow.

by pcprof on Aug 28, 2010 6:18 PM PDT reply actions  

About those attendance numbers...

Va Lib,

- Houston has just played (and won) in front of the largest home crowd in its history: 32,119
- By Saturday’s kickoff, total season tickets were at 11,500, compared with the previous record of 6,300
- Fewer than 5,000 tickets remain for three of the seven home games, and there are no more than 7,500 left for any of them

’Nuff said.

by eminencegrise on Sep 5, 2010 1:02 AM PDT reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to the Mountain West Connection we are dedicated to all things MWC. For Convenience follow us @ JeremyMauss via twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
WAC That Should've Happened
Werder_small
Navy, the Big East and the "giant sucking sound"
Werder_small
"Dissolve" MW and C-USA and re-form?
Werder_small
The Mtn.: Get Active
Hillbillies_small
bowl pick'em second round results and third round format
Hillbillies_small
bowl pick'em round one results
Werder_small
New AD Jack Graham has big plans for CSU
Werder_small
2012 CSU Rams Helmet Concept Re-Design - Vote Now!
Hillbillies_small
come one, come all. second chance to be the top picker.
Nevada-logo3_small
Pick 'em Postseason - New Format (All Players Welcome!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jer_small Jeremy Mauss

Authors

Pro-nedna-twitter-icon01_small Sam (sdsuaztec4)

6061-1_1__small rebelfan1

Img_0065__1__small greekpadre

Bsu_logo5_small bluesyourdaddy

Tcuflag_small Ben Findley

Commander_in_chiefs_trophy_small airforcetwo

Nevada-logo3_small pack_fan

Nevada_wolf_pack_logo_small WolfpackNev

007_small Chris Holly Taylor

Werder_small jitmon

Capo_small Anthony Capobianco