Don Bebee Guaranteeing $17 Million Per Team In Next Big 12 TV Contract
Now one can say Don Bebee for not trying to save the Big XII from most of the league taking their show out West. Bebee has also mentioned that the Big XII could stay together by attempting a raid of the Mountain West, then either C-USA, and perhaps the Big East. Now, Bebee is putting together a drastic plan that actually looks good to keep the Big XII together:
--Beebe has secured information that enough money could be inked in its next TV negotiation (in 2011) that revenues per school would jump from between $7 million and $10 million in the Big 12 currently to $17 million, which is what the SEC pays out.
-- Three different sources at Big 12 South schools being targeted by the Pac-10 told Orangebloods.com Sunday morning that Dan Beebe's attempts to secure a new TV deal on par with the SEC's $17 million/school payout for the 10 remaining schools in the Big 12 is in play.
--Individal institutions would be allowed to pursue their own networks, which has been a goal of Texas. If the Longhorns went to the Pac-10, they would have to forgo their own distribution platforms, including a network, because the Pac-16 would seek to have a conference network in which all inventory is shared.
(Consultants have put Texas' ability to generate revenue from its own network at between $3 million and $5 million after a start-up window of about three years.)
--The Big 12 would proceed with 10 teams. Everyone would play everyone in football, providing a nine-game conference schedule. And the option to save or dump the conference championship game would be determined by the institutions.
The most intriguing item that would keep Texas around is the concession that would allow any school to create their own television network, and that could sway Texas to stay since the Pac-10 is not willing to allow a school owned network. The very questionable scenario is the $17 million that is apparently guaranteed to the league starting in 2011. This assumes that the Big XII can re-up with their ESPN/ABC deal, because that contract runs through the 2016 academic year. The only deal that is currently set to expire is the Fox Sports Net, and unless the league is going form a partnership with over the air Fox and Fox Sports, then that number might have a chance.
That $17 million is on par with what the SEC gets in their television deal with ESPN and CBS, and I find it hard to believe that a Big XII league that has ten teams with the best television market being Kansas City at 31. Texas is a national brand and really carries the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and of course the Austin market. This amount of money seems too good to be true.
The school owned networks would have very little chance of showing football games. Most likely Olympic sports, women's hoops, and some men's basketball games. Actually football games could be considered because the Big XII still has some games that are still offered on pay-per-view if no network picks them up, but with a new potential $17 million television deal expect every football game to be on the Big XII television package.
There has been so much information out there, and it is plausible that Don Bebee has secured that amount of money, but if the league allows schools to have their own television network then that might put Texas over the edge to stay a member of the Big XII. Also, the Longhorns and Aggies really do not want to split up if they do not have to.
Now assuming the league gets Texas to stay what does it mean for the rest of college football? Does the Big XII go after the rumored reports of BYU and Air Force, or do they grab Utah and BYU to strengthen the conference. Does the Pac-10 go for Utah to create a 12 team league, or is the rumor of an eleven team league team really a possibility.
Follow Mountain West Connection via Twitter and Facebook for news quick hits and random nonsense.
18 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Where is "Don Bebee" getting this info from
I didn’t see anyway they were going to get that amount even with Nebraska and Colorado. Now its pretty doubtful for them to get that much money.
Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!
I know
I am very spectacle especially since the ESPN deal goes for a few more years, and the Fox deal is the one set to expire.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
by Jeremy Mauss on Jun 13, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
The Fox deal is the problem which lends some credence to it
it’s the same shitty deal that the Pac-10 is going to dump. I don’t see them getting it since they lost 15% of their total revenue and the Denver market…but stranger things have happened…since last Wednesday.
Basically
With the pot that was split 12 ways is now split 10 ways, plus the $10 million each from the parting teams, that means they would have gotten $12.5 before.
That is consistent with figures for the Big 12 I have seen.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
That's great and all...
but I’m not sure where he thinks that anyone is going to pay 1.5x more for .83x as much product.
Yes, because the Big 12 without Nebraska or Colorado is worth tens of millions more than the ACC. Maybe Bebee is predicting a full economic recovery by then so networks will be splurging, that’s the only way I can rationalize why the state of Texas alone is worth about as much as the proposed Big Pac’s revenue with their own network.
Far too little, far too late, Beb. Your conference has a 95% chance of doom on Tuesday.
I can see the value going up
But over doubling with 2 less teams is unlikely. Unless, Bebee has some super secret Big XII network up his sleeve and is currently renegotiating with every possible outline, but even then to get this done in a few days is unlikely.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
by Jeremy Mauss on Jun 13, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Unless his plan is to invite Florida or something to get major media markets outside of Texas and KC the Big 12 network would be pretty pointless.
by HawkeyedFrog on Jun 13, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
They would have...
KC (32), STL (21), Austin (48), Houston (10) and DFW (5). Those are all top 50 markets.
However their reach is limited and without Denver (#16) their not going to get as much as the new Pac-?…even if it only goes to 12.
and
they would have OKC and Tulsa, that are in the 10 ten for ratings of actually WATCHING college football
Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com) and one of the top Rockies writers at the Bleacher Report.
Oh right...I forgot about OKC...
but that clocks in at 45 and Tulsa not until 61. Even combined those two metros would not even be a top 25 market. Compare that with the Pac-10 (assuming the Big-12 stays together and they grab Utah).
LA (2), SF/SJ/Oak (6), PHX (12), SEA (13), Denver (16), Sacremento (20) (no team, but it is considered in the P-10 media footprint), PDX (22), SD (28…see Sacremento), SLC (31).
So between 7 and 9 (depending on how you view it) of the top 31 most populated markets in the country, vs 6 (or 7 if you use the footprint logic you have to include #37 San Antonio) of the top 50.
I just fail to see how he came up with $170 million per year in a TV deal, when it was thought that the Pac-10 (even adding Utah and CU) wasn’t going to get much above $125-130.
Ugh
Jeremy,
Nice to see ya visit my home base of Rock M Nation.
I seriously want Dan Beebe gone.
I’m not as big on the conference loyalty thing. I’m loyal to my team and want to hate KU in everything and NU in football. The other things don’t matter as much to me.
But I’ve never seen such feckless, ineffectual management outside of the political world (and maybe BP).
Ye gads.
Pigskin Punditry
Follow me on Twitter
I reject your reality and substitute my own." ~ Adam Savage, Mythbusters
well
I find it hard to believe that a Big XII league that has ten teams with the best television market being Kansas City at 31.
If you are assuming the Big 12 stays with 10 teams, the two top markets would be Houston (#5) and Dallas/Fort Worth (#10), not Kansas City.
There was an offer by Fox Sports Network (the national net, not the regional) to essentially become the de facto Big 12 Network that came out a few days ago, and I think that is what Beebe is basing his numbers on. This is really too little, too late, though. If Beebe couldn’t get a conference network or a lucrative conference television contract worked out before, how is he suddenly supposed to be able to do it now? This is just a last, desperate ploy by Beebe to look like he is doing his job, when it is obvious to every observer he failed badly at his job.
Markets
yes, Houston and DFW are owned by UT. The number seems too good to be true.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
by Jeremy Mauss on Jun 14, 2010 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions
How the damn?
How is the Big 12 gonna raid the MWC if all but five teams leave. You have to keep six teams that have played together for 5 years to maintain a BCS status. So the BIg 12 drops to 5, guess what…BCS AQ gone. Why would a MWC team want to jump onboard that sinking ship? I think the MWC will make a play and end up an AQ conference.
by ThePhlipinSituation on Jun 14, 2010 8:51 AM PDT reply actions
Exactly
Unless the Texas and Co. don’t jump ship, then it makes no sense for an MWC team to go there. At that point we could pick up the best of the left overs to make a really good 12 team conference.
Mountain West Connection - The best site for MWC Sports.
UNLV is going all the way this year!

by 






















