Mountain West Connection: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Republican Joe Barton's College Football Playoff Act of 2009

There is an expected vote this week in the House or Representatives on H. R. 390 which is a bill to implement a college football playoff.  The bill is sponsored by Joe Barton a Republican from the state of Texas and was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce January 9, 2009.

Not sure if the bill will force a playoff since Harvey Pearlman who is the Chairman of the BCS said it is the BCS or they will go back to the old system of October back room deals with little or no conference affiliations in the big money games.

Below is an excerpt of the bill and important talking points after the jump:

To prohibit, as an unfair and deceptive act or practice, the promotion, marketing, and advertising of any post-season NCAA Division I football game as a national championship game unless such game is the culmination of a fair and equitable playoff system.

Star-divide

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

  •  

    (6) the colleges and universities whose teams participate in the post-season football bowls experience significant financial windfall including increased applications for enrollment, recruiting advantages, increased alumni donations, and increased corporate sponsorship that provides a competitive advantage over universities whose teams are ineligible or statistically at a disadvantage from the BCS bowl competitions because of their conference affiliation.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITED ACT.

    (a) Promotion of Game- It shall be unlawful for any person to promote, market, or advertise a post-season National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) football game as a championship or national championship game, unless the game is the final game of a single elimination post-season playoff system for which all NCAA Division I FBS conferences and unaffiliated Division I FBS teams are eligible.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

    (a) Enforcement Authority- A violation of section 3 shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)). The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The prohibition in section 3 shall apply to any post-season NCAA Division I FBS football game that occurs after January 31, 2011.

The bill is fairly short and does not offer solution other then a single elimination tournament which is quite obvious.  Also, who knows if Congress will have to create a playoff or will it have to go back to either the NCAA or the school Presidents which could produce a meager plus one that would not have solved anything this year with five undefeated teams.  If a college football playoff is run by the NCAA then every league must be involved and a 16 team playoff that includes all 11 conference champs and five at-large berths.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We Need a 32-team playoff in college football!!

A 32-team playoff is something I’ve long advocated for college football. It would assure every school that even remotely deserves to play for the national championship in a given year gets the chance to do so.

There is a detailed look as to how it can be done that you can see by going to:

http://www.toosmarttofail.com/32teamplayoff.html

by Wallyhorse on Dec 8, 2009 3:59 AM PST reply actions  

Barton's bill

does not force any change to the structure or revenue share of the BCS.

The National Championship Game would simply have to be renamed and the BS would move on. Or they would go back to the traditional bowl arrangement.

The BCS would argue that all FCS teams are eligible for the two team single elimination tournament in place if they finish in the top 2 of the final BCS standings, so this bill might not have anny effect at all.

BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter

by utesfan100 on Dec 8, 2009 7:14 AM PST reply actions  

Did I say BS

I meant BCS, honest.

BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter

by utesfan100 on Dec 8, 2009 7:15 AM PST reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to the Mountain West Connection we are dedicated to all things MWC. For Convenience follow us @ JeremySBN via twitter.
Start posting on Mountain West Connection »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

In Progress: South Carolina Leads Southern Miss

Photo link

In Progress: No. 15 Pittsburgh At Utah

Alabama defensive lineman Marcell Dareus (57) catches a pass intended for Texas wide receiver D.J. Monroe (26) during the second quarter of the BCS Championship NCAA college football game in Pasadena, Calif., Thursday, Jan. 7, 2010. Dareus went on to score a touchdown on the play. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

NCAA Rules Marcell Dareus Must Miss Two Games For Contacting Agent

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Jer_small Jeremy Mauss

Authors

Cam_animal_small bhsmarine

Aztec_small Sam (sdsuaztec4)

S6300955_small Michael Rueckert

6061-1_1__small rebelfan1

Small SNAKE34

Tcuflag_small Ben Findley

Cougarhead_old_blue-n-tan_icon_small BYUmitch

Small JoshWalrath