Revisiting the Mountain West Conference Television Deal
With all the commotion about DirecTv being temporarily dropped from Versus over a rate increase, it is time to rehash my favorite punching bag which is known as the Mountain West Conference television package. A few years back the Mountain West decided to jump ship from ESPN --and consequentially their local television affiliates-- for a deal with CBS College Sports --then CSTV. The new deal paid nearly double the money that ESPN was offering and guaranteed no more midnight eastern hoops games part of Big Monday and football would be on Saturday with a few Thursday games.
While there have been improvements with games in high-def and then availability on DirecTv. Most of the country is not able to get the The Mtn., which broadcasts the majority of the football and basketball games. To get the channel one must be in the regional footprint and your cable carrier must have the channel; which most do now. DirectTv customers within the league footprint gets the channel for free, but if you live outside then the channel is on the sports package at a charge. Currently Dish Network does not have The Mtn. in any of their lineup packages.
The first big rumble was a few weeks ago when Florida State traveled to BYU and the game was on Versus. That game was labeled a huge success by Versus even though the four plus million DirecTv viewers were not able to view. The grand total was a .940 which equals just under one million viewers. Now compare that to the Florida verse Kentucky game was 3.5 million viewers. More big games as TCU vs. BYU is on Versus in two weeks and that game could shape the BCS race for both teams.
The reason the television deal is perceived as laughable, is because of where the games are on the dial. For starters The Mtn. is available nation wide on DirecTv however if you live outside of the league footprint the channel is only on the sports pack which lowers the viewership by quite a bit, and my educated guess would be maybe be a couple million subscribers.
Then on cable the channel is on 29 carriers that serve basically all of Utah, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada minus Reno, Colorado, all of Arizona, Wyoming, San Diego, Orange County California, very little of Texas and not in Fort Worth. However, the channel is not on the basic package for most of these cities, but rather require some sort of upgraded package.
Dish Network does not even carry The Mtn. in the league foot print, and to get Versus and CBS College the lowest package is the Classic Gold 250 which is $47.99 per month. Then on DirecTv to get The Mtn people in the local foot print get the channel for free similar to the regional sports channel. However, if a fan wants to get the channel and lives outside of the area must subscribe to the sports pack that includes all the regional sports. Then to get CBS College Sports the package is a reasonable $39.99 with the Choice Xtra, and Versus is currently not available because of the dispute over a nickle.
So, as people can tell it can be a chore if you live outside of the area --or even inside-- to get the channel, and the odds of a voter or even casual fan can find it tough to watch the Mountain West unlike the Big Ten Network. It also does not help when on DirecTv all these channels are in the 600 range.
For those who do not know the CBS deal does not allow for games to be shown on local affiliates with ESPN Regional television, so there are actually games that are not on any of the three networks and can not be shown even in the local market.
The television deal is ideal if you are a fan of the bottom teams because nearly every game is on tv and can be seen nation wide. Before the only teams on national television was BYU, Utah, Colorado State, and the short time TCU was in the MWC before the deal came along. As explained earlier in this piece the move was because of money, and little or no week night games or 10pm local basketball tips.
Commissioner Craig Thompson must get the league back on ESPN and should follow the Big Ten model-- if possible. Which has the top games on the ESPN networks and then the rest on the Big Ten Network. My opinion is that Versus needs to be dropped in favor of ESPN, because Versus does not show games every week with Mountain West football, and very few people have even heard of the channel or know where to find it if they did want to.
The Mtn. channel and CBS College Sports should host most of the games, with ESPN hosting one or two games a week that are the best matchup, and yes Thursday or Friday night games might be required but that would be worth the exposure. Thursday night used to be WAC/MWC night with those schools getting a night to themselves, but now it is taken over by the BCS leagues. To make things more faire the MWC could have a tier system where one week CBS College gets the first pick, The Mtn. gets the first pick, or something along those lines so those channels are stuck with always having bad matchups featuring New Mexico and San Diego State every week.
There have been rumors of CBS showing games at noon eastern on Saturday mornings so that they could have more double headers which would be great, but those are just rumors are probably not going to happen. Getting back on ESPN would be the ideal choice I understand that The Mtn. is the leagues channel and they want people to subscribe to it, however getting people and voters to see the games is the most important issue.
15 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I disagree 100% with getting the MWC on ESPN.
I >>>HATE<<< ESPN.
When the MWC had an ESPN deal most of the Utah games were relegated to ESPN gameplan, which requires a price similar to Direct TV’s Sports PAC. Never mind that every away MWC game, except TCU Clemson, that ESPN has had the rights to they have shown.
The fact that TCU @ Clemson was not on national TV, where if it was at TCU it would have been, speaks to the weakness of the ACC’s TV contracts, not the MWC’s.
ESPN coverage does not give the same focus to the teams in the game that ANY OTHER NETWORK provides. Instead they talk about featured upcomming games and other ESPN programming.
My dream MWC football line up would be:
Featured MWC game of the week on CBS
A MWC game on each of CBS C and Versus each week
All remaining games on the mtn.
I would guarantee the mtn at least two games per week, but allow CBS C and VS. to pick games ahead of them. Thus if not enough games are available, these would be the weeks vs. does not have a MWC game.
I would let the mtn. pick three games per year to feature their brand, but only after CBS picks thier featured games of the week. I would also allow CBS to swap their featured game for a game on the mtn regardless of this selection, if a weeks notice is given.
Since CBS owns the mtn. this should not be much of an issue.
The dispute with Direct TV may be the best publicity possible for VS. and they have a quality product that is gaining market share annually. MWC football on VS. is one of their better features ( ass opposed to a side feature that is dispensable like we would be on ESPN), and allows for a partnership that should be built rather than abandoned.
With the Addition of Boise State there would be 5 MWC games once conference play came around, giving the mtn. 2 games each week.
I agree the MWC TV deal can use some improvements. Dish Network needs to pick up the mtn, even if this is means it is bundled into a sports teir like the Direct TV Spoirts PAC. I would much rather see CBS decide to show a MWC game every Saturday than have a deal with ESPN. Boise State would help this happen a lot.
As a Utah fan in Florida without Direct TV Sports PACin Florida I have seen three Utah games this year with one more on tap, as CBS C and Versus are readily available here. This is similar to the number of nationally televised game Boise State will get on ESPN this year, and most of the Utah games were on Saturday.
Nice points
Very true on the ESPN promoting other shows during the lesser games as example last nights Sun Belt tilt. The reason games prior were on gameplan were either because the game was on a local affiliate but was run by ESPN regional tv, or an ABC game (which was few and far between) which also had four other games at the same time just like last weekend.
If the games were on ESPN or ESPN2 that would be fine, but if the MWC were to go back to ESPN games might be regulated to ESPNU which is not on the same tier as the other two, which I agree with you there.
The thing with Versus is that their football/hoops games are sporadic and not consistent. Now if they did at least a weekly game that would help. Also, they should try to have a nightly sports show like sportscenter. They have the NHL, Big XII, Pac-10, and MWC football/hoops plus the UFL.
A CBS deal would be great, and totally agree with the tier system. The Mtn. should be for the lower level games with an occasional higher profile game, or simulcast which they do quite often with either Versus or CBS C.
The reason for ESPN -even though I do not totally agree- is for exposure because the casual football fan does not know these channel exist or want to find them. ESPN gives those folks who include voters a way to watch. I tuned in for half an hour to watch the craptastic sunbelt game last night.
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 14, 2009 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions
I would argue ESPN U is worse than VS.
VS. is on far more local cable providers nationally, usually as part of the basic package.
VS always has an afternoon game, whether the MWC is on or not. The PAC 10 gets some billing as well.
It is true that wedging football between hunting, fishing and the motorcross circuit gives vs. a bit of a scattered focus.
you forgot bullriding but i kinda like the pbr. vs was called the.......
outdoor network before it was versus?
by wolfmanshowlforever on Oct 14, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
True
To slightly defend ESPNU that channel is on a lower tier on Dish then Versus (which for some reason is on a top tier), while DirecTv is swapping ESPNU for ESPN Classic. The HD is what kills me for U they advertise HD and the logo is in the corner but I have DirecTv HD receiver and all, but never get U in HD.
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 14, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
I hate the Mtn’s camera’s they are worse quality than even standard definition. So if they could stop being cheap and upgrade to HD that would change my feelings toward the network. Get with the times!
So true...
The Mtn does have HD in November but you are right that all the games should be in HD.
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 14, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Problem with Versus
Is that anyone with Direct TV can’t get it right now! I get cable through CSU which is Direct TV so no luck for me. Versus went out and just recently I got the Big Ten network or something in its place. So now I have to miss out on hockey games and my college football.
The Mtn should sack up and carry the big games or get out of the way so a big name can take the rights to the games. I hate having the games spread out over so many channels that I may or may not get. If the MWC thinks it is a big name conference they should act like one and get a real TV contract. It is hard for voters to vote on teams if those games are not being shown on their TV’s.
Bring back Fum's Song!
who made the decision to send the third place mwc team to the independence bowl next year.....
was it craig thompson?
by wolfmanshowlforever on Oct 14, 2009 4:24 PM PDT reply actions
how much higher? i can't be that much and if you take away the travel expenses it's probably not worth it
it probably screws the students who want to see it live too.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Oct 14, 2009 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions
only 100k more
It is odd for third team to go with a lower payout
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 14, 2009 7:09 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
very nice work. pelt loved it. Thank you very much for this information
robot oyunları oyna | kral oyun | ben 10 oyunları
by kral oyun on Aug 2, 2011 5:22 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs

by 
















