Final Week of Simulated BCS Rankings
As always the simulated BCS rankings are brought to you by the BCS Guru who does a great job putting this together, so make sure to patronize their site as a thanks to their hard work, the standings appear after the jump.
The big noise about the BCS standings that officially come out next week is that Alabama and Florida could meet in the BCS title game after the meet in the SEC title game. Fat chance on that happening; oh how people forget the same scenario was being tossed about in the 2006 game that featured #1 vs. #2 when Ohio State played Michigan.
That played out as expected with no rematch a month later. So, the odds of a Albama/Florida rematch the next game is unlikely, first Texas would have to lose a game and so would Virginia Tech, USC, Boise State, Cincinnati, and TCU. Texas looks to be in the most trouble because two computer hate the Texas and have them 17th and 21st which is the by far the worst out of th top teams, and one would have to look all the down to Penn State at 14 to see comparable computer scores. Texas is currently 11th in the average computer rankings. Even with that being so low Alabama/Florida will loss and it is very doubtful a one loss Virgina Tech, USC, LSU, or an undefeated Boise State or TCU will pass the Longhorns.
Even though Boise State stayed in the same spot after being jumped by Va. Tech and staying ahead of LSU they did gain valuable computer points this week. Now for them to get to the title game they will need the computers help, but even last year with Utah's high computer rankings they were no where near the number two spot. The Broncos must blowout othe rest of their opponents, and hope Idaho and Oregon keeps winning to improve their SOS. The only teams below Boise who they most likely should be able to hold off are Ohio State, Iowa, Cincinatti, and Iowa.
TCU has the teams left on the schedule to get a boost in the rankings with BYU most likely being in the top 15 after they beat San Diego State, and then Utah who should be 8-1 and ranked in the top 20. These teams left have a chance to propel them ahead of Boise State even if Boise loses, but that means TCU will have to jump a potential undfeated Cincy from the Big East, and many one loss teams who will get the benefit of the doubt; such as USC, and Ohio State. Jumping Iowa and LSU will not be an issue for TCU but the others will be difficult. LSU plays Alabama next week and that most likely will result in a LSU loss, and Iowa does play Ohio State later on in the year.
BYU is still in the mix because they play TCU and Utah; with a win over both of those schools coupled with other losses should easily propel the Cougars into the top 12. They will need help from either Tulsa or another WAC opponent to take out Idaho. Utah is the extreme darkhorse, but because of schedule they have a shot they also play two top 20 teams in BYU and TCU; toss in Air Force who is a 7-8 win team and Utah should be able to move near the top 12. The Utes will need help from Cincinatti, because if Utah is not in the top 12 then they must be in the top 16 and have a BCS league champ below sixteen; so Cicny might have to lose twice for that to happen.
The official standings are released next Sunday night, so more controversy can be flung around sports talk radio, print, and the fun loving blogosphere. Also, remeber the season is still young and there is a ton of football to be played.
| Rank | Pvs | Team | Rk | Coach | % | Rk | Harris | % | AH | CM | JS | KM | PW | RB | Cp Avg | BCS | Conf |
| 1 | 3 | Florida | 1 | 1468 | 0.9953 | 1 | 2831 | 0.9933 | 25 | 22 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.970 | 0.9862 | SEC |
| 2 | 1 | Alabama | 3 | 1378 | 0.9342 | 2 | 2684 | 0.9418 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.960 | 0.9453 | SEC |
| 3 | 6 | Virginia Tech | 4 | 1241 | 0.8414 | 4 | 2386 | 0.8372 | 18 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 16 | 0.800 | 0.8262 | ACC |
| 4 | 4 | Texas | 2 | 1402 | 0.9505 | 2 | 2684 | 0.9418 | 21 | 21 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 22 | 0.540 | 0.8108 | B12 |
| 5 | 5 | Boise State | 6 | 1170 | 0.7932 | 5 | 2274 | 0.7979 | 22 | 15 | 22 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 0.780 | 0.7904 | WAC |
| 6 | 7 | USC | 5 | 1175 | 0.7966 | 6 | 2250 | 0.7895 | 14 | 11 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 13 | 0.550 | 0.7120 | P10 |
| 7 | 2 | LSU | 10 | 944 | 0.6400 | 9 | 1905 | 0.6684 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 18 | 0 | 23 | 0.790 | 0.6995 | SEC |
| 8 | 10 | Ohio State | 7 | 1122 | 0.7607 | 7 | 2073 | 0.7274 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 0.530 | 0.6727 | BTen |
| 9 | 8 | Cincinnati | 9 | 973 | 0.6597 | 8 | 1935 | 0.6789 | 19 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 0 | 14 | 0.630 | 0.6562 | East |
| 10 | 9 | Iowa | 12 | 785 | 0.5322 | 11 | 1697 | 0.5954 | 23 | 25 | 19 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 0.820 | 0.6492 | BTen |
| 11 | 11 | TCU | 8 | 979 | 0.6637 | 10 | 1805 | 0.6333 | 16 | 19 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 21 | 0.630 | 0.6424 | MWC |
| 12 | 12 | Miami (FL) | 11 | 847 | 0.5742 | 12 | 1627 | 0.5709 | 13 | 12 | 16 | 19 | 0 | 12 | 0.530 | 0.5584 | ACC |
| 13 | 13 | Oregon | 16 | 620 | 0.4203 | 14 | 1350 | 0.4737 | 17 | 17 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 19 | 0.730 | 0.5413 | P10 |
| 14 | 15 | Penn State | 13 | 782 | 0.5302 | 13 | 1371 | 0.4811 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0.040 | 0.3504 | BTen | |||
| 15 | 16 | Kansas | 15 | 640 | 0.4339 | 16 | 1141 | 0.4004 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0.200 | 0.3447 | B12 | ||
| 16 | 25 | Nebraska | 17 | 491 | 0.3329 | 19 | 869 | 0.3049 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0.370 | 0.3359 | B12 |
| 17 | 19 | Georgia Tech | 20 | 420 | 0.2847 | 20 | 771 | 0.2705 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0.370 | 0.3084 | ACC |
| 18 | 17 | Oklahoma State | 14 | 676 | 0.4583 | 15 | 1186 | 0.4161 | 0 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.2915 | B12 | ||||
| 19 | 22 | Brigham Young | 19 | 441 | 0.2990 | 17 | 963 | 0.3379 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0.040 | 0.2256 | MWC | ||
| 20 | 23 | Oklahoma | 18 | 447 | 0.3031 | 18 | 883 | 0.3098 | 0 | 10 | 0.000 | 0.2043 | B12 | ||||
| 21 | 24 | South Florida | 21 | 305 | 0.2068 | 21 | 691 | 0.2425 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0.080 | 0.1764 | East | ||
| 22 | 30 | South Carolina | 22 | 279 | 0.1892 | 22 | 481 | 0.1688 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.080 | 0.1460 | SEC | |
| 23 | 18 | Wisconsin | 30 | 37 | 0.0251 | 29 | 90 | 0.0316 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 0.360 | 0.1389 | BTen | |
| 24 | 28 | Notre Dame | 25 | 76 | 0.0515 | 25 | 142 | 0.0498 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 0.200 | 0.1004 | Ind | |
| 25 | 14 | Auburn | 26 | 73 | 0.0495 | 24 | 164 | 0.0575 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0.150 | 0.0857 | SEC | |
| 26 | 34 | Utah | 29 | 49 | 0.0332 | 26 | 119 | 0.0418 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 0.180 | 0.0850 | MWC |
13 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For the record...
BCS Guru has an excellent history of accurately estimating the BCS standings Saturday night before he retires for the night.
As long as Utah, BYU and TCU win this week the MWC should start the BCS standings like the started the other polls: with three ranked teams, plus one in the top 10.
boise state has no chance to play in nc game
they would take a 2 loss sec team and a two loss usc team over them. boiste state after the 13 games will have a losing record when it comes to teams they have beaten. not counting uc davis either. after beating tulsa they will be around even in win and losses. look at the rest of their schedue. it’s filled with losing teams who now just play each other in the wac. it’s simple math they won’t have a winning record vs the teams they beaten. even if oregon wins the rest of the game’s which they won’t. utah state is 0-4 without there win over fcs team. they will probably only win two game since they can’t beat nmsu. san jose state only has one win vs a fbs team. those teams will drag boise under.tcu on the other hand will beat a 9-3 byu team and a 10-2 utah team. i’m basing this figures on end of year totals.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Oct 13, 2009 10:43 AM PDT reply actions
Yes
I agree the odds are high, but I do not think they will be dragged down too far and can keep some teams off of their backs.
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 13, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
i'm not putting down boise state either. it's just the system we have for now
i think both boise and tcu get bids this year if they both go undefeated. it would help greatly if usc and ohio state run the table. big east has no chance for two bids. acc very unlikely. notre dame is going to get beatdown by usc this week and will lose another game maybe stanford. 9-3 does not get a bcs bowl bid. so that means ther are two bids left. say penn state has 2 losses. penn state is ranked 14th in nation. i don’t know why other than tradition. the combination of their wins vs the teams they have beaten so far. 4-12 i’m not kidding. i’m only counting wins vs fbs members to. the pac-ten second place team will definitely have at least 2 losses. same thing in big ten. iowa another weakass team with a 6-0 record. beat powerhosue northern iowa by onme point in their house and beat an arkansas state team who is 0-3 vs fbs teams by three points. i want either tcu or boise to get a shot vs an sec team.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Oct 13, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
Boise is good but very slim chance for BCS title game. Now it would take a TON to get both TCU and Boise in. The SEC would need to dominate the top 14 rankings, and if Iowa stays ranked high because they most likely will not get chosen.
by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 13, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I might have discussed this topic elsewhere...
It is probably more likely that the SEC will get three teams in BCS bowls (thanks to last years rule interpretation allowing this to happen in some cases) than that Boise State or TCU would get to the NCG.
What if Oregon goes 11-1 and jumps Bosie State for a NCG berth?
Last year the BCS clarified a potential conflict in the rules.
If a conference has the top 2 teams and a third team wins the conference championship all three would be guaranteed a spot. The two teams per conference rule was thus clarified to apply only to at-large selections.
Last season had the possibility of Missouri winning the Big 12 with 2 Big 12 South teams #1 and #2 in mid november when this was discussed.
This overturned a ruling in 2002 when their were only 4 BCS bowls and half the available at-large spots.
It doesn't apply only to at-large selections.
What is means is that the championship team, if not a conference champion, does not count against the 2 allotted spots.
So in order to get 3 teams you need a situation like Oklahoma in 2003, where the team playing for the national title did not win its conference championship (Kansas State did) and then you would also need a top 3 or 4 team (like Texas last year) to get a guaranteed spot. Then you are allowed to have 3 teams, but that is the only situation (as I understand it) and is so unlikely as to be almost impossible. 2003 would not happen under the current BCS rules, because USC would have taken OU’s spot in the title game against LSU.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Oct 15, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions
#3 and #4 spots only guaranteed if they are not a thrid team from their conference.
The three team is scenario is precisely this:
#1, #2 AND a third team crowned the champion.
If you only have two of the three, those are the two participants in the BCS bowls and no other teams from that conference will be eligible.
This would actually be a nightmare situation I would love to see in its own right. It would do more to break the BCS than leaving undefeated MWC, WAC or even Big East teams on the sidelines ever will.
Oh, okay.
That’s never going to happen. Ever. That scenario is so unlikely as to be, for all intents and purposes, impossible.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Oct 15, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions
thanks for the clairification
Chaos is great and I would love to see that happen, but as dispacedute said very, very unlikely.

by 





















